I am making a PCB for a SIM968 GSM/GPS device. Printing PCBs in my country is expensive.

I am making this PCB for two different purposes. One is to work in an open environment where there is enough GNSS satellite signal is evident. In this case size has to be minimal and I wish to solder the GNSS antenna on to the PCB and let the signals flow in to the RF in of the SIM968 GPS engine.

In the second scenario, I wish to connect an external active GNSS antenna because of the harsh environment problem. At this time there will be no PCB GNSS antenna soldered to the PCB.

In both situations, I will only have one antenna connected to the SIM968 at a time. Therefore there will surely be no out of the phase cancellation or reduction of signal strength due to signals from both antennae.

However I wish to divide my 50 Ohm characteristic impedance line into two to accommodate space to fix both antennae. I made my self more clear through the image below.

enter image description here

I do not want to accommodate another antenna switching IC.

Please be kind enough to let me know if this approach is flawed. I would so much appreciate your design views and any other information I should keep in my mind while I am designing the PCB. All PCB paths to antennae will of 50 ohm characteristic impedance.


1 Answer 1


If I understand correctly you want to make one PCB to fit both scenarios. I would do this with a 0 ohm resistor, connecting to either one or the other antenna. Maybe there is already a coupling capacitor in the trace to the antenne then you could use this.

To minimize the impact on the 50 ohm impedance of the transmission line maybe you could place not 2 but 3 solder pads for the 0 ohm resistor or the capacitor. Then depending on which 2 (of the 3 pads) the component is soldered, antenna 1 or antenna 2 is connected.

  • \$\begingroup\$ In either way the weak GNSS signals are to go through the 0 Ohm resistor. The zero Ohm resistor does not have the characteristic impedance of 50 Ohms. Wouldn't that degrade my overall performance? Could you please tell me why my approach is wrong? I would like to learn as to why my approach may be not suitable. \$\endgroup\$
    – Denis
    Commented Jun 18, 2015 at 16:57
  • \$\begingroup\$ Indeed, a zero Ohm resistor is not 50 ohms. But you could build a 50 ohms transmission line with a 0 ohm resistor in it ! Confusing isn't it ? ;-) Well, you know that a 50 ohms transmission line on a PCB is made of ... copper ! Also (nearly) 0 Ohms ! Have you read: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Characteristic_impedance ? If not, you should ! \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 18, 2015 at 19:38
  • \$\begingroup\$ The 50 ohms is more a property of the traces on the PCB at a certain frequency. That trace on the PCB can be partly replaced by a 0 ohm resistor and if done properly it would still be a 50 ohms transmission line. Not exactly but good enough not to disturb the (1.8 GHz) GPS signal. Actually, it's good that we do not need a 50 ohm resistor because that would add noise ! And a GPS signal is very weak, about as weak as the noise of a 50 ohms resistor ! Go figure ! \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 18, 2015 at 19:40

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.