2
\$\begingroup\$

Actually it is given in Sedra smith that to reduce input offset current effect is to use a resistance at non-inverting terminal of the opamp whose value is same as the DC resistance seen by the inverting terminal.

I am actually confused that what is meant by "resistance seen by the inverting terminal"? Is he referring to calculate Thevenin resistance from inverting terminal?

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ Yes. Exactly. You got it. \$\endgroup\$ Jul 23 '15 at 9:04
3
\$\begingroup\$

I don't know what it says precisely in sedra smith but you can't do anything about input offset current. However, if you mean input bias current then that is eradicated by making the dc resistance seen by both inputs the same value. So, if there is a 100k feedback and a 100k input resistor to the inverting terminal then, ideally, you should have 50k seen by the non-inverting terminal to 0V. Thus bias currents produce an error voltage at each input terminal that is identical and thus cancel out.

enter image description here

Input offset current is the difference between the bias currents on each input terminal and this is not so easily got rid of.

Of course if the bias current is only 1nA and you are using 1k resistors (i.e. quite small values) then the worst case dc voltage error produced (if you don't have a resistor in the inverting input) is 1 uV - probably far less than the input offset voltage of the op-amp and therefore not worth bothering about.

See this (MT-038: Op Amp Input Bias Current - Analog Devices) for further reading on the subject.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.