enter image description here

My book says that by varying Vgs the transconductance varies in a non linear fashion (this all happens in the "linear" or ohmic region of the FET) and it is constant in the saturation region.I just cannot get it!!


Take a look at this, the (fairly) standard characteristic of a FET: -

enter image description here

Transconductance or "current out to volts in" is quite different between the linear region and the saturation region. In the saturation region if you lift the gate voltage from 4 V to 5V you get a corresponding change in the drain current of about 17mA to about 24mA and both ratios are about the same - not perfectly the same but enough to say that "transconductance is fairly constant in the saturation region".

The saturating transconductance varies a little bit with drain-source voltage and so it's not a perfect thing to say BUT people do say it and design circuits assuming it is a reasonable axiom.

Go to the linear region and note that for a given gate voltage (say 4V) the drain current is near enough totally dependant on drain voltage. People use this area as variable resistors - the gate controls the resistance between drain and source. Increase the gate voltage and the resistance lowers. It's more appropriate to call this section the linear (ohmic) region because there is no singular dependancy of drain current on gate voltage.

As a footnote, if you see a FET characteristic drawn like below where all the lines from 0,0 seem to merge into one until the saturation region begins to break them out individually, I have one thing to say and that is "THIS IS DRAWN WRONG": -

enter image description here

  • \$\begingroup\$ But how is the transconductance non linear in the ohmic region?That is the reason the FET's are biased in the linear region when operating as mixers.. \$\endgroup\$ – muhammad muheeb Aug 15 '15 at 10:27
  • \$\begingroup\$ Because it isn't mainly dependant on Vgs. It's also of little use to refer to transconductance in any way when in the linear region. I haven't seen the book you mention but there are probably better ways of stating things rather than labelling it as non-linear. Maybe you can take a picture of the page? \$\endgroup\$ – Andy aka Aug 15 '15 at 10:31
  • \$\begingroup\$ You could argue that the saturation region is "current out with volts in" and the linear region is "conductance out for volts in". \$\endgroup\$ – Andy aka Aug 15 '15 at 10:34
  • \$\begingroup\$ I have edited my post.This is from Microwave by David M Pozar!! \$\endgroup\$ – muhammad muheeb Aug 15 '15 at 10:36
  • \$\begingroup\$ If Vds is held constant, then the transconductance is fairly constant (and proportional to Vds) in the ohmic region. \$\endgroup\$ – Spehro Pefhany Aug 15 '15 at 10:43

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.