There's a lot of documents that talks about dimensioning of the transformer for a SMPS power supply (in this case one quadrant only is not of my interest).

this site cites the following:

The main constraint in all cases (except for saturable inductors) is that peak magnetic flux density Bmax should not approach the core material's saturation flux value Bsat.


Contrary to popular misconception, Bmax does not depend on the magnetic material properties or air gaps. It does not depend on the transferred power neither. However, for thermal reasons, we have to limit ohmic losses in the wires. Most textbooks provide formulas for estimation of the core size based on the product of magnetic cross-section area by the window area available for the winding. Unfortunately, this method is not very helpful because these formulas are based on pretty much arbitrary selection of current density and on an assumption of a certain window utilization (fill) factor.

So, I calculated the Bmax for my project, and it gives-me similar results to that of poweresim.com. But with the AwAe method it requires more than 4 times the core size!

Anyway, the Bmax formula being close to the results, it does not have the current included in the formula. So that any power (respecting the Vpk and f in the formula) could be used with the same Ae transformer.

Is the core size not dependent on H, just B? That is, having enough space for windings for the projected currents/potentials and getting Bmax below saturation Bsat, and dis-considering hysteresis, eddy-current losses, what should I consider?

If not what should I consider then? If I try to calculate H, it will give-me values really above saturation (from B-H curve), for near most materials, so I think thats wrong.


1 Answer 1


I don't know if you have miscalculated but it works like this.

H is ampere turns per metre and the metre part is the mean length around the core that the magnetic lines of flux follow: -

enter image description here

So, amps (peak) x turns (primary) divided by core length gives you H (peak). Note that the "amps" number chosen is the magnetization current i.e. NOT THE SECONDARY LOAD CURRENT (referred to the primary).

Next you have: -

B = \$\mu H\$ where \$\mu\$ is the effective magnetic permeability of the transformer core in absolute units. Effective permeability depends on several factors such as length of core (mentioned above), the cross section, the material type and if any gaps are present.

The manufacturer of the core will tell you the effective permeability of the core you choose. You may also choose to gap the core and this dramatically changes effective permeability.

Next, look at the data sheet for the core and see what flux density will be produced for the given H field. If it looks like it's beginning to heavily saturate then increase turns a tad.

If turns are (say) doubled, primary inductance quadruples and current quarters. This is useful because, for a given primary drive frequency, if you double the turns you half the H field. If really pushing the core you will have to consider gapping.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Read, studied, calculated, applied, but still the results don't match. With lets say \$ \frac{32 \times 60}{0,0184} = ~104347 \space H(A/m) \$ ! With this I will need a core bigger than a line frequency transformer, even trough I know of projects that uses this core with 6Kw easily. What I need to apply seems to be the relative permeability to get a new H(A/m) value? The manufacturer only provides a fixed \$ \micro e \$ or one related to temperature. Even trough it is an integral and so gives even more bigger values. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Sep 7, 2015 at 6:42
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Where does the 32 and the 60 come from - one of them is current but i suspect you have used the full load current referred to the primary - you should use the no-load current for calculating flux density because load ampere-turns in secondary exactly cancel load ampere-turns in primary. \$\endgroup\$
    – Andy aka
    Commented Sep 7, 2015 at 9:59
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ It's the no-load current flowing in the primary that determines saturation. \$\endgroup\$
    – Andy aka
    Commented Sep 8, 2015 at 9:30
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Or to formulate better: Primary inductance \$ Lp = Al \times N² = 9000 \times 3600 = 32mH \$ Magnetization current \$ Imag = \frac{V \times t}{L} = \frac{285 \times 0,000025}{0,032} = 0,22A \$ Magnetization force \$ H = \frac{I \times N}{Le} = \frac{0,220 \times 60}{0,0184} = ~717 A/m \$ \$\endgroup\$ Commented Sep 9, 2015 at 12:54
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Sorry, so much unit conversion. \$ H = \frac{I \times N}{Le} = \frac{0,220 \times 60}{0,184} = ~71 A/m (~0,89 Oe) \$ well below saturation point. Thanks for your help. I will take a look at the permeability, seems that in \$ B=μH -> μ = μm = Kmμ0 \$. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Sep 9, 2015 at 13:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.