I'm trying to save board space. I know crystals typically have 20-30 pF ratings, and need 20-ish pF caps to ground.

I found this crystal: http://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/AVX-Kyocera/CX3225GB10000D0HEQCC/?qs=sGAEpiMZZMsBj6bBr9Q9aSMajaFx5yeOFWolaA6tkgz4rswCxFq0Sg%3d%3d

It's extra-small (2.5x3.2 mm), has an ESR of 200 ohms (which seems high - is that going to be a problem?) and a load capacitance of 8 pF.

I know that in general, you need caps to ground. But I have also read that there's typically 5-10 pF of parasitic capacitance which should be subtracted from the caps you add. So - does an 8 pF crystal need caps at all?

This is for a real product, so I don't want to cut corners if it will hurt reliability.

EDIT: I found two other people asking the same question; I read the answers they got; I still don't know whether it's correct to leave off the caps. How do I deal with different XTAL pin capacitance when selecting XTAL and load capacitors and How do I choose the correct capacitors to use with my Crystal?

One of the answers said it would be "easier" to design with a crystal with more capacitance, but didn't say why; other answers say that getting within a factor of 2 is probably sufficient. From this, I deduce that the more capacitance the crystal needs, the less you will be messed up by mis-estimating the stray capacitance. So I should pick a crystal that needs 30 pF, put 25 pF on each leg, and I'll probably be good.


1 Answer 1


This ESE answer contains a good explanation of what having an incorrect load capacitance could do.

Personally I would never do this, because I don't like coming back to pain-in-the-butt problems when they surface much later down the line - I like to ensure they never happen instead.

From this TI Application report we can estimate around 1-3pF of stray capacitance per inch of trace for a PCB with a power and ground plane, Bear in mind that given the high contribution from fringing fields (as the capacitor's gap is larger than its width) you will get material permittivity contributions from your solder resist as well as the FR4 of the PCB. Hence if you are relying on a few stray pF to get you through, a different resist process might have a relatively large impact on this. As you note in your question, this is why crystals with a higher loading requirement are easier to design with - a larger percentage of the load capacitance is in the tightly-controlled precision component you paid for, and less in the vagaries of the PCB production process.

If space is an issue for you, have you considered either using an internal oscillator source or a ceramic resonator (which is a one-component solution) as an alternative? Neither will have the same accuracy or stability as a crystal, but you may find you don't actually need that timing accuracy in your application.

  • \$\begingroup\$ I didn't ask whether I should cut corners. I asked whether it would be correct to leave off the caps for an 8 pF crystal. I do want timing accuracy since I'm playing sounds, and a deviation of 0.1% or less may be detectable by sensitive listeners. \$\endgroup\$ Sep 7, 2015 at 21:05
  • \$\begingroup\$ Did you read the linked answer? It explains the side effects of having an incorrect crystal value and that leaves you to make your own decision. By the way, choosing an internal oscillator option or a ceramic oscillator is not cutting corners - it's choosing a different option. At least those choices would be operating within their rated limits. \$\endgroup\$
    – stefandz
    Sep 7, 2015 at 21:42
  • \$\begingroup\$ I did read the linked answer, and a couple of other answers in the sidebar that I edited my question to reflect. The linked answer told me that I definitely want to have a correct crystal/cap circuit - which I already knew. It did not tell me whether a correct circuit would have capacitors, or no capacitors, on an 8pF crystal. \$\endgroup\$ Sep 8, 2015 at 1:51
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @ChrisPhoenix As this answer states, unless you want to rely on some quantity of capacitance due to your process, either do the calculation yourself, based on the materials that will be used in your process, and the geometry of your layout. If you're unwilling to do that, just put the darn caps on. How much board space are you really saving? \$\endgroup\$
    – RYS
    Sep 8, 2015 at 21:22

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.