I have a 3 phase motor and 3 phase power supply (400V, 50Hz)

Currently this motor produces 1.5hp in torque and ~1750rpm. I need it to produce less.

My question is:

Is the best way to go about this, a rheostat or a VFD? The cheaper the better.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Less what? Torque or speed? \$\endgroup\$ – JonRB Sep 18 '15 at 19:51
  • \$\begingroup\$ @JonRB Well both, preferably, but as R Drast mentioned, a higher load will reduce the speed as well, in that case just a rheostat would work, yes? \$\endgroup\$ – Trippy Sep 18 '15 at 19:59
  • \$\begingroup\$ If your motor is rated 1.5 Hp at 1750 RPM, it is a 60 Hz motor, not a 50 Hz motor. What is the rated voltage? You need to start by figuring out what the motor will do with 400V, 50 Hz applied. \$\endgroup\$ – Charles Cowie Sep 19 '15 at 0:50
  • \$\begingroup\$ If the load is a fan or centrifugal pump, you have some chance of getting some reasonable operation with a rheostat. To know what will happen, you need to know and understand the torque vs. speed characteristics of both the motor and the load. Your question reveals very little about either. \$\endgroup\$ – Charles Cowie Sep 19 '15 at 1:00

The ONLY is going to be use a VFD. To vary the speed of a three phase motor, you need to change both the frequency and voltage. That is exactly what a variable frequency drive does. Using a rheostat to vary the voltage will cause the torque to drop off, but won't change the speed until except that it will drop when loaded due to reduced torque. It will also heat up more than it should.

  • \$\begingroup\$ @R Drast If I ensure adequate cooling, will a rheostat be adequate? Much more important than speed, I need a lower power rating. \$\endgroup\$ – Trippy Sep 18 '15 at 20:05
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Then use a lower power motor. And the torque characteristics will be horrible from just reducing voltage. What exactly do you mean anyway about "Power Rating"? \$\endgroup\$ – R Drast Sep 18 '15 at 20:27

The speed of rotation is going to be dependent on the line frequency. If you want to change the speed of rotation, at least with any reliability, you need a VFD.

The torque may imaginably be controllable just by adjusting the voltage, but I wouldn't make any guarantees about the motor lifetime in that configuration. With a rheostat, the losses will be substantial.

A VFD in the power range you're describing costs $300-$400. http://www.automationdirect.com/adc/Shopping/Catalog/Drives/GS2_%28115_-z-230-z-460-z-_575_VAC_V-z-Hz_Control%29/GS2_Drive_Units_%28115_-z-230-z-460-z-_575_VAC%29/GS2-42P0 http://www.automationdirect.com/adc/Shopping/Catalog/Drives/DURApulse_-GS3%28230_-z-_460_VAC_Sensorless_Vector_Control%29/DURApulse_-_GS3_Drive_Units_%28230_-z-_460_VAC_SLV%29/GS3-42P0

A rheostat rated for anything close to that power will cost comparable: https://www.digikey.com/product-search/en?pv2=130&pv2=532&FV=fff40004%2Cfff80540&k=rheostat&mnonly=0&newproducts=0&ColumnSort=0&page=1&quantity=0&ptm=0&fid=0&pageSize=500

A third approach is a variable transformer, or variac. That would let you adjust the voltage getting to the motor in a much more efficient way than using a rheostat. A viable unit can be had on eBay right now for $60, though of course that's going to change over time. And used variac vs. new VFD is not an apples-to-apples comparison, obviously.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.