20
\$\begingroup\$

In this Linear Tech App Note 13, page 28, Jim describes:

A final form of probe is the human finger. Probing the circuit with a finger can accentuate desired or undesired effects, giving clues that may be useful. The finger can be used to introduce stray capacitance to a suspected circuit node while observing results on the CRT. Two fingers, lightly moistened, can be used to provide an experimental resistance path. Some high speed engineers are particularly adept at these techniques and can estimate the capacitive and resistive effects created with surprising accuracy.

Was he joking? If not, how do the such techniques work in practice to provide accurate estimation? Could anyone describe an actual scenario that those engineers applied such techniques?

The application note, and my question is in regards to low voltage, high speed signals, not mains or high voltage.

\$\endgroup\$
11
  • 7
    \$\begingroup\$ That title... creeps me out. \$\endgroup\$
    – Passerby
    Oct 15, 2015 at 7:06
  • 5
    \$\begingroup\$ I do sometimes use my finger in audio circuits to inject a signal (50 Hz from mains with a lot of distortion so easy to hear). This will work if the point in the circuit is high-impedance and sensitive enough. Suprising accuracy ? I doubt it, I guess the engineers were just lucky. \$\endgroup\$ Oct 15, 2015 at 7:06
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ The most dangerous part of testing with touch is creating a path for High Voltage/Current through the heart. Passing the current between two fingers is much less dangerous. AN old electronics shop class teacher used to do it for a mains voltage shock toy he built. Myself, much less adventurous, test 9v batteries with my tongue. I can tell how much life is left by how weird my tongue feels afterwards. \$\endgroup\$
    – Passerby
    Oct 15, 2015 at 7:13
  • 6
    \$\begingroup\$ Using google I have discovered that he mentioned this in several other app notes. I don't think it is a joke. But I think Jim Williams belonged to the group of pioneers of analog electronics, and they prided themselves on their eccentricities. You can read about Widlar and Bob Pease, etc. People who designed the circuits used in textbooks and were responsible for the creation of all the IC companies we know and love. \$\endgroup\$
    – user57037
    Oct 15, 2015 at 7:32
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ Also good for causing opamps to oscillate in my experience, by touching their output. It turns out the human body capacitance is "just right" for quite a few opams to go crazy. Actually, I've recently seen some experiments confirming the human body capacitance values I kinda suspected: youtu.be/vNpGoNP1tGQ?t=174 \$\endgroup\$
    – Fizz
    Oct 15, 2015 at 7:52

1 Answer 1

36
\$\begingroup\$

A finger is a very useful item of test equipment. The main problem when fault finding is knowing which bits of the circuit are susceptible, and which bits are OK. As you stare, dumbfounded, at a recalcitrant bit of board, it's good to be able to get any handle on what is going on, just a hint of where to start looking more closely. At one place I worked, its use was known as 'the laying on of hands'. A finger has the following uses and advantages.

  1. It is always available
  2. It can be used to inject ambient signals into a node, increasing the output of hum of RF breakthrough. Generally useful with high impedance low frequency circuits. Use capacitive (dry skin) or resistive (wet skin) coupling.
  3. It can be used to ground a node.
  4. At low frequencies it can add capacitance to a node, changing time constants, filter tuning etc.
  5. At microwave frequencies, it can absorb and redistribute RF radiation, damp resonances, reduce signal levels, absorb the higher harmonics on an open signal line.
  6. It's not generally recognised that high speed busses to memories and FPGAs are now running so fast that a finger on the lines will change rise-times, introduce crosstalk between clock and data, or reduce clock ringing, any of which can affect data integrity. I have dabbed a data bus while looking at the resultant TV picture, and could tell whether I had address setup or data crosstalk problems.
  7. It can take the temperature of components, from 'that's OK' through 'it's running a bit hot' to '$$$ it's that one!'
  8. It can cool selected hot components, improving the heatsinking, to see if temperature changes matter.
  9. The speed. While watching an oscilloscope trace, listening to a demodulated signal, or watching a BER number, you can stroke your finger across a whole board in seconds. Any place it changes, that's a good place to think about whether you expected it to change there.

As a seasoned engineer, there have been many times in my career when several of us have sat round a mis-performing board, and the joke round the table was that if we could 'buy an engineer's finger, and glue it just there', we'd be good to ship.

And the question of accuracy. You don't need 3 digit accuracy, you need to know whether none, or a few pFs, makes a difference here. Once you know where to play with, you switch back to soldering chip components or trimmers.

And yes, all this usefulness comes at a price, you must not use it on circuits above 40v.

\$\endgroup\$
5
  • 13
    \$\begingroup\$ f) It can take the temperature of components, from 'that's OK' through 'it's running a bit hot' to '$$$ it's that one!' - which can include branding the manufacturer's logo into your finger tip. \$\endgroup\$
    – JRE
    Oct 15, 2015 at 8:43
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ The big mystery of RF design: "How do I build the electrical equivalent of a finger, using electrical components?" ;-) An analysis using solid theory is one thing, troubleshooting is another. Engineering is using both. \$\endgroup\$
    – zebonaut
    Oct 15, 2015 at 8:53
  • 9
    \$\begingroup\$ "3 digit accuracy" - I see what you did there. \$\endgroup\$
    – Gusdor
    Oct 15, 2015 at 14:19
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ +1. You could add another use of "wet finger test" - it allows to detect signals that are insufficiently biased (floating) - if a small, 200-500k leakage through a wet finger causes some unconnected or configuration pins to disrupt device's functionality, one can surely expect problems in mass manufacturing due to possible flux contamination (no-clean fluxes are notoriously bad, and can develop conductive "bridges" down to 5-10kOhms of resistance, dependent on ambient humidity). \$\endgroup\$ Jan 9, 2017 at 21:22
  • \$\begingroup\$ You can also "pull" a bias voltage up or down with your finger in a high-Z circuit by touching a finger to both it and a ground or supply voltage \$\endgroup\$
    – endolith
    Mar 24, 2017 at 19:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.