-2
\$\begingroup\$

I am designing a charging and discharging capacitor circuit for my power harvester. What I am looking for is the time it charges and discharges respectively. When I lookev over wikia and google. All they mention is a rise until it can barely reach max and a sudden drop before it really hits bottom.

for Example:

Seconds:......1secs....2 secs.....3 secs....4 secs

Charge%:.......45%.......60%......75%.......93%

Discharge%:....55%......40%.....25%.........7%

etc...

And how will a C or L capacitance filter work? And how does it affect the filtering? Let me know if this is not a proper question. Thank you for your help!

\$\endgroup\$

closed as unclear what you're asking by Leon Heller, PeterJ, Null, Fizz, Daniel Grillo Oct 27 '15 at 10:55

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I am unsure as to what you want or need. \$\endgroup\$ – Andy aka Oct 26 '15 at 20:45
  • \$\begingroup\$ a formula pertaining to time and volume \$\endgroup\$ – Gareth Compton Oct 26 '15 at 20:46
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ The way in which you write down your question urges me to suggest to you that you might want to study some of the basics about electronics. \$\endgroup\$ – Bimpelrekkie Oct 26 '15 at 20:50
2
\$\begingroup\$

I'd take a look at this website: -

enter image description here

This informs you that there is indeed a formula (an exponential formula) that governs how the voltage on a capacitor rises when injected with charge from a constant voltage supply fed via a resistor.

The magic number is ~0.63212. This number tells you that with a fixed voltage applied to a resistor in series with a capacitor, the voltage on the capacitor rises to 63.212% of the applied voltage in a time that equals R*C. For the next time period it closes the gap by another 63.212% and ad infinitum. Here's possibly another useful site.

Get this inside your head and then come back and ask about the LC circuit because that is an order of magnitude more subtle and complex

\$\endgroup\$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.