10
\$\begingroup\$

I only very recently started getting into electronics as a hobby, and the little amount of theory I got in college did help, when I actually started remembering things :P

Anyway, my next project is a regulated box mod for electronic vaping, as I have been off cigs for 2 years now, and really want to make something my own(though I don't care if you want to use anything I have made if it is even worthy).

The goal was a regulated box mod with a linear and flat dc voltage control, down to 0.2 ohms are 5V.

Obviously this means I will need high rated batteries, fuses, and running them in series, but a few other challenges, like keeping the voltage control off the high current. This is what I have come up with. (The labeled test points and meters hooked up will make sense later).

enter image description here

Flipped around to make it easier to read:

enter image description here

If there is anything obviously glaring, please educate me on issues that I may see in the real world. I have ran this schematic through all the simulations I could think of and everything seems to look fine, but let me know if you see anything I did not notice, or am simply ignorant of :P

enter image description here

This shows the harsh voltage drop out occurring at 6 volts, and although it is a consequence of the op amp I chose, it is actually a very good thing as it'll make it obvious when I need to change batteries. I may actually use a diode to intentionally drop the voltage a volt, as I currently have about 1 extra volt of headroom in the way I like to vape anyway.

enter image description here

This shows how well it should handle the load depending on the resistance of the coil. Obviously 0.1 ohms is when things start going wrong.

enter image description here

This shows how linearly it regulates the voltage, and the point in which the op amp can no longer keep up. 6V is out of the range I would ever be vaping at anyway.

enter image description here

Finally, this shows the voltage leakage when the mod is left on but without the fire button pressed. Seems pretty small to me, but if I did/didn't do something that made this worse than it should be, let me know.

EDIT: Sorry about the schematic being backwards and inside out LOL. The location of the components are relative to the location when assembled to make following it easier when assembling. I did not think about it being so difficult for the vets to 'proofread' because of that. I flipped it around so maybe it is a bit less confusing to read on the updated version above.

EDIT 2: So I believe I have finalized everything at this point. All I have added is an upper limit on the voltage, to take some stress off the off amp and fuses in case mistakes are made, as well as a cutting the voltage if the batteries are too low, to prevent accidental over-draining. If you are interested, here is the updated schematics with sweeps:

enter image description here

enter image description here

Showing the now pseudo-linear voltage voltage delivery with the sharp voltage drop when batteries are low.

enter image description here

The voltage curve maxes out due to a 5.6V zener reference. Turning the potentiometer so it approaches 100 bypasses the zener, didn't worry about it as I may find it useful.

enter image description here

No more sharp voltage drops using 0.1 ohm coils.

\$\endgroup\$
6
  • \$\begingroup\$ That schematic is a little tricky to read, being all flipped around like that... \$\endgroup\$ – Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams Nov 2 '15 at 2:50
  • \$\begingroup\$ Sorry about that. The schamatic is meant to be easier to read when assembling. Sorry about the non-standard convensions, I am mostly self self taught. The position of the components are approximately where they will be located when assembled, to keep things tidier when I do assemble it. \$\endgroup\$ – Richard Smith Nov 2 '15 at 4:13
  • \$\begingroup\$ Ignore the grouchy people, your question has been one of the best documented I have read here and the mother grundies can only find fault with your schematic conventions becuse their brains have ossified. Hang in there, some good advice will follow. \$\endgroup\$ – KalleMP Nov 2 '15 at 6:56
  • \$\begingroup\$ I am a programmer, so I know how irritating it is for people to ask for help when they really just want someone to do everything for them, while they pretend it was them. Perhaps I went overboard documenting, but I guess it was so I felt worthy of outside advise :) \$\endgroup\$ – Richard Smith Nov 2 '15 at 9:07
  • \$\begingroup\$ Wow, that is some weird topology. If you flipped the opamp inputs around it would start to make sense... you may have to adjust some other values. \$\endgroup\$ – George Herold Nov 4 '15 at 2:29
1
\$\begingroup\$

Your schematic doesnt look very energy efficient .Consider the ratio of mosfet heat to Vap heat.In fact your mosfet could Vap.Because the Vap is an element it will have some thermal mass so you could feed it PWM where the mosfet is either on or off .Your expected efficiency at low frequencies could easily be 90% justification of this figure is with 10milliohm Nchan mosfet which is not expensive these days.You can make pwm with most micros or you could use a LM393 .In fact making PWM is easier than getting rid of the heat.A bonus of this is that your power requirements will be significantly lower.

\$\endgroup\$
6
  • \$\begingroup\$ I understand and i did go out of my way to avoid PWM, because it does effect vaping experience, which is definitely a subjective opinion. I am willing to work with the heat to avoid it. As far as using an nfet over a pfet, I do know nfets are typically better at having a lower forward diode voltage, however, the full saturation voltage is too high anyway, so both would be dissipating similar amounts of heat either way, correct? IRF4905 or IRF1404 would likely be my choices here. The forward diode voltage is -1.6 vs 1.5 respectively. Not much of a difference here. Am I missing something? \$\endgroup\$ – Richard Smith Nov 4 '15 at 12:31
  • \$\begingroup\$ ...as far as my choice of mosfet is concerned, the RDS(on) in my instance is something I could care less about, as I am using it as a current regulating resistor(typically non-linear, but the opamp takes care of linear-izing that), and actually avoiding full saturation. The only thing that really makes me really think about using an nfet instead, is the ability to use the metal chasis as a heatsink. \$\endgroup\$ – Richard Smith Nov 4 '15 at 12:48
  • \$\begingroup\$ If you used a open drain N channel mosfet and fed the gate with PWM your heatsinking needs will be much smaller. \$\endgroup\$ – Autistic Nov 4 '15 at 20:16
  • \$\begingroup\$ 3rd times the charm I hope. "i did go out of my way to avoid PWM, because it does effect vaping experience, which is definitely a subjective opinion." \$\endgroup\$ – Richard Smith Nov 5 '15 at 8:56
  • \$\begingroup\$ I vape and would like to know how pwm could affect the experience. \$\endgroup\$ – Andy aka Nov 5 '15 at 19:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.