I have a 24 MHz, crystal on my board and datasheet of IC defines the load capacitance between 5-9pF. The reference design I follow don't use any load capacitor.

My traces look like this:

enter image description here

shorter trace is 3.3 mm long, the longer one is 8.6 mm long.

Referring to the application note here, I use a signal generator at 24 MHz. Output of the generator and a scope of my oscillator are placed to an end point of a path, the second scope is placed to the other end. But, I don't observe any voltage/waveform/phase shift changes at the oscillator. I tried it by applying ramp, square, and sine wave forms, but output is the same for all.

Could anyone explain how to measure the parasitic capacitance of the paths? What do I need to do after measuring the capacitance, say I measure 1pF at the short path and 4 pF at the long path, do I simply need to add them and then compensate the required capacitance by placing load capacitors?

  • \$\begingroup\$ I think you're focusing too much on the capacitance of these traces. I guess that they have a capacitance (to ground or to eachother) of less than 0.5 pF. The crystal's load capacitors do not need to be that accurate in value anyway. \$\endgroup\$ – Bimpelrekkie Nov 16 '15 at 11:32
  • \$\begingroup\$ I was referring the answer on electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/121659/… says that parastic capacitance should be between 3-5 pF, I wondered if I need to measure the capacitance in order to determine if I really need the caps or not ( other method is to try and see, but I want to learn how it is properly done) \$\endgroup\$ – Angs Nov 16 '15 at 11:40
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Most of that 3-5pF capacitance I mentioned is typically the input/output capacitance of the chip. \$\endgroup\$ – Spehro Pefhany Nov 16 '15 at 11:42
  • \$\begingroup\$ The capacitance of a trace 4 thou wide on a 4 thou core is about 1.1pF per inch. Your tracks are much shorter than that, so the parasitic capacitance is, as Spehro notes, dominated by the capacitance of the IC the crystal is attached to. \$\endgroup\$ – Peter Smith Nov 16 '15 at 12:19

There is a way to measure the impedance of a trace which requires transmission line theory.

But usually is only considered if the wavelength is comparable to the board size and for 24Mhz is approximately $$\lambda = \frac{c}{f} = \frac{3\times10^8}{24\times10^6}=12 metres$$

so any reflection of that wavelength is going to be virtually nothing on a trace thats a cm or 2.

Lets first assume that your traces are lossless which is safe assumption for low power traces. so our propagation constant is given as $$\beta=\omega\sqrt{LC}, \omega=2\pi f$$ which is related to wave length by $$\lambda=\frac{2\pi}{\beta}$$ anyway by the magic of the telegrapher equations derived by Oliver Heaviside we get the characteristic Impedance of$$Z_0 = \sqrt{\frac{L}{C}}$$ Which is impedance per unit length so how do we find L and C? Answer: dimensions

Mind you this is extremely simplified and only rule of thumb

Image below is a crossection of PCB track

trace crossection

$$L=\frac{\mu d}{w}\rightarrow\mu = 4\pi \times10^{-7}$$ $$C=\frac{\epsilon w}{d}\rightarrow\epsilon = 8.85\times10^{-12}$$

This is PER METRE so multiply this by how long your track is IN METRES

$$ 8.8mm = 8.8 \times 10^{-3} $$

The u looking greek letter mu is the permeability of free space in Henrys per metre.

The e looking greek letter epsilon is the permittivity of free space in Farads per metre.


Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.