4
\$\begingroup\$

During my studies at university, we didn't go too in depth about Signal to Noise ratios (SNR) and Total Harmonic Distortions (THD). I've been trying to work with audio codecs for some time and I only now just wondered if there was anything I could do to improve the signal quality external to the audio codec.

Specifically I'm working with the SSM2604 from Analog Devices which states it has: Snippet from SSM2604 datasheet

So I'm curious, is there anything I can do, apart from high pass and low pass filters, to the incoming signal that may improve these values?

Also how would these values change if I am using the codec at a higher sampling frequency? I expect that the sound quality would degrade somewhat but I'm quite ignorant in this area of EE.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ Try running at 96kHz sampling - adoubling of speed usually results in a 1 or 2dB SNR increase. \$\endgroup\$
    – Andy aka
    Nov 24, 2015 at 21:17

1 Answer 1

2
\$\begingroup\$

Your signal chain performance is limited by the weakest link, and for audio that's generally the DAC and ADC. You need to be careful that the analog portions don't degrade the DAC/ADC, but that's eminently do-able.

The digital/analog conversion process produces artifacts that manifest themselves as spurious signals -- 'spurs'. It's spurs that contribute to your SNR (more serious parts will specify their SFDR -- spurious-free dynamic range). If you were dealing with pure tones, it would in theory be possible to map and ignore or mask spurs, but it's unrealistic in practice, and well-nigh impossible to do for an arbitrary audio waveform.

Bottom line is it's very hard to improve your DAC/ADC from the outside. (If it was easy, everyone would be doing it.) You can add dither to your waveform, which has the effect of reducing spurs, but it comes at a cost of raising the noise floor -- it's a tradeoff that needs to be checked on the bench. If your DAC supports higher sample rates, upsampling can provide better performance, but it really depends on the part -- analog performance vs frequency tends to peter out at some point.

The part you have chosen looks like it's aimed for consumer applications where nobody is going to look very closely at the technicals (it's only specced at 48 ksps). It just needs to sound okay. So if you want better performance, you need a different choice of parts.

\$\endgroup\$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.