1
\$\begingroup\$

I've been working through a few examples of Thevenin Equivalent circuits, and came across this one.

Find the Thevenin Equivalent circuit as seen by a load resistance between points A and B.

Finding the equiv. resistance wasn't too hard (75ohms), but I'm having trouble calculating the equiv. voltage.

I've attempted the questions, but am not sure I got the correct answer. Here's my working.

The total voltage of the circuit is 12V because of two aiding voltage sources being in series. From this, you can use a voltage divider between the two 150ohm resistors, getting a value of 6V. Another voltage divider can be used to find the voltage at node B, that being 2.4V.

Not sure I've done the next thing correctly -

I've assumed that Node A is 3V, and since the Thevenin voltage is the difference between Node A and B, Thevenin Voltage = 3-2.4 = 0.6V. Have I done this question correctly?

Figure 1

Anywho, any help is greatly appreciated.

| improve this question | |
\$\endgroup\$
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ You seem to be trying to solve this as one problem. I would split it in 2 simple ones: 1) 9V + 150 ohm + 150 ohm and 2) 3 V + 100 ohm. Now make Thevenin equivalent for each. What do you get ? for 1 you get 300 ohms in parallel with a current source and for 2 something similar. Now redraw your schematic and note how only node A and B are remaining making the problem trivial to solve. \$\endgroup\$ – Bimpelrekkie Dec 15 '15 at 15:46
  • \$\begingroup\$ There is not 12 V across the two 150 ohm resistors. \$\endgroup\$ – Greg d'Eon Dec 15 '15 at 15:58
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Gregd'Eon The source voltage is 12V, I don't think I mentioned there was 12V across the two 150 ohm resistors. \$\endgroup\$ – Elliot Randall Dec 15 '15 at 16:01
  • \$\begingroup\$ That means you are misunderstanding voltage dividers. The voltage between the two 150 ohms is not 6 V. \$\endgroup\$ – Greg d'Eon Dec 15 '15 at 16:03
  • \$\begingroup\$ Oh, my bad! The voltage divider should be 12 * ((150+100)/150 + 250) - giving 7.5V? \$\endgroup\$ – Elliot Randall Dec 15 '15 at 16:08
5
\$\begingroup\$

I think there was some confusion in the comments, so I'll write up an answer.

The circuit we're talking about is:

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

Note that I've left out the load - it has nothing to do with your Thevenin equivalent.

Your goal is to make a circuit that looks like:

schematic

simulate this circuit

so you need to find two things: the equivalent resistance and the Thevenin voltage. You already found \$R_{eq} = 75 \Omega\$, so I won't go over that.

The Thevenin voltage of a circuit is the same as the open circuit voltage: when you leave the load disconnected, \$V_{th} = V_{ab}\$. That means that all you need to do is find \$V_a\$ and \$V_b\$ with no load.

\$V_a\$ is easy - it's just 3 V - so the harder part is $$ V_b = (3V + 9V) \frac{100 \Omega}{150\Omega + 150\Omega + 100\Omega} = 3 V $$ so $$ V_{th} = V_a - V_b = 0 V $$

That means the Thevenin equivalent of this circuit is just a 75 ohm resistor - there's no voltage across the terminals.

| improve this answer | |
\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ This the correct method approaching a Thevenin/Norton problem, in every sense. The comments below the question made the problem more confusing for the asker than it should be. \$\endgroup\$ – deadude Dec 15 '15 at 17:29
  • \$\begingroup\$ I agree - there is no need to use the Thevenin transformations. It's usually much simpler to find any 2 of V_oc, I_sc, and R_eq. \$\endgroup\$ – Greg d'Eon Dec 15 '15 at 17:30
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Gregd'Eon Thanks for clearing things up - may I ask though, what are Thevenin transformations? Has that something to do with the Norton Equivalent? \$\endgroup\$ – Elliot Randall Dec 15 '15 at 17:44
  • \$\begingroup\$ Exactly. You can switch back and forth between Thevenin and Norton equivalents without affecting the rest of the circuit. This lets you do some things more easily -- sometimes doing these transformations puts components conveniently in series/parallel -- but it's not really a bulletproof method. \$\endgroup\$ – Greg d'Eon Dec 15 '15 at 17:50
0
\$\begingroup\$

here we can use superposition theorem.when 9v is active and 3v is shorted,we should use voltage devider rule to find the voltage of 100 ohm.this is 9/4(B+ & A-).now,3v is active and 9v is shorted,we again use voltage devider rule to find the voltage of (150+150)ohm.this is 9/4(B- & A+).so totally v_th=9/4-9/4=0

| improve this answer | |
\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.