1
\$\begingroup\$

I've a question about how are related Wifi throughput and it's range. For example, if we assume a simply antenna like PCB antenna or ceramic antenna and a wifi frequency of 2.4Ghz, what is a partical rate of Wifi based on your experience? Something like, you can have 50Mbps at 5m and 10Mbps at 10m with 1% packet loss. Or if there is a particular relationship between range and rate.

I premise that I'm looking to have an idea of wifi ranges without a particular antenna gain.

\$\endgroup\$
4
\$\begingroup\$

There is indeed a pretty fundamental relationship between data rate and range. It's embodied in the idea that for a certain data rate purity (i.e. small numbers of errors) there is a certain energy per bit required to "reliably" counter the background noise.

The background noise is related to the receiver band width and the bigger the data rate is the wider the bandwidth needs to be. Thus wide bandwidth transmission links need more power to get a certain distance to overcome the receivers noise that is picked up. It all comes down to the following equation: -

Power required by the receiver in dBm is -154dBm + 10log\$_{10}\$(data rate) dBm

So, a 1Mbps link requires a receive signal level of -94 dBm for example.

Some WiFi units may specify a slightly higher figure but it's all down to understanding their assumptions about the bit error rate that they judged to be acceptable. Here's a useful table: -

enter image description here

Stolen from this website and please note the theoretical free space ranges quoted have got feet and meters mixed up.

Some of the figures in the table above assume different packet error rates than others i.e. the 11Mbps data rate should theoretically require -83.6 dBm but the table specifies -90 dBm. Also different modulation schemes can introduce a variability in the value. See this page for a few more pointers: -

enter image description here

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ Does the first table ("Table 2") have feet and metres swapped? \$\endgroup\$ – Brian Drummond Dec 16 '15 at 13:12
  • \$\begingroup\$ @BrianDrummond D'oh it looks that way!!!! \$\endgroup\$ – Andy aka Dec 16 '15 at 13:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.