I just wanted to learn some differences between volts, amps, ohms and so forth and came up with this question. If your skin has 100k ohms resistance and the outlet is 220v wouldn't the current flowing through your body be 0.0022 amps?
In Europe the rule is generally 60V DC is safe for casual contact with live conductors. Read what the IEC says: -
The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) has issued several reports on electrical safety. The IEC “Electrical installations of buildings” report (IEC 60634-4-41:2001) specifies that for unearthed circuits “if the nominal voltage does not exceed 25 V a.c. r.m.s. [35 VPEAK] or 60 V ripple-free d.c., protection against direct contact is generally unnecessary; however, it may be necessary under certain conditions of external influences (under consideration).” For earthed circuits the IEC considers protection unnecessary when “nominal voltage does not exceed 25 V a.c. r.m.s or 60 V ripple-free d.c., when the equipment is normally used in dry locations only and large-area contact of live parts with the human body is not expected; 6 V a.c. r.m.s. [8.5 VPEAK] or 15 V ripple-free d.c. in all other cases.”
Extract taken from this document.
The sort of voltage level talked about in the extract isn't generally believed to sufficiently break down the skin's "high surface resistance" BUT, mains voltages are lethal because they DO break down the surface resistance and then you just have the body's internal resistance and this is only a few hundred ohms. With (say) 220V AC applied, the current can be greater than 100mA and this is really problematic: -
An interesting and related spin off subject is the well-known effect of a human body damaging electronic circuits by static discharge. The human body is modelled as a capacitance to earth of about 100 pF. This capacitance is charged up to several kV and the discharge path into the electronics under test is via a current limiting resistor.
An important thing to note is that unless the human body directly connects to earth (a rarer situation than normal), the current flow due to touching a live wire is somewhat limited by this capacitance.
This document entitled "Measurements upon Human Body Capacitance: Theory and Experimental Setup" concludes that about 160 pF is a the human body capacitance in the following experiment: -
So if we connect to 220V 60Hz, 160 pF has an impedance of 16.6 Mohms (reactive) and would cause a reactive current of about 13.3 uA. I don't think capacitive effects are going to be very significant.
Unfortunately the 100kohms resistance is only true in some conditions. First you also have skin capacitance so it will conduct AC better than DC. Second, the skin resistance itself is not constant with the voltage even at DC; it goes down as voltage goes up. And third, there's variation with skin wetness/humidity including from person to person. I'll dig up some references for these facts I reproduced from memory.
Have a look at this book Bio-Medical CMOS ICs for more details than I can hope to convey here.
The topic is complicated because skin capacitance mostly depends on its thickness but skin resistance mostly varies with the number of sweat ducts and how full they are. So you can have an area with low capacitance because of thick skin, but which still conducts well if it has a high concentration of sweat ducts.
Typical figures given there are 0.02-0.06uF/cm^2 for skin capacitance (but also said to vary by an order of magnitude between different body areas). For the resistance (that goes in parallel with that capacitance) it's much more difficult to pin a number because it varies significantly even in the same person and same area over time:
Another book gives a range of 60 to 1200kOhm/cm^2... which is a huge range [depends on body area and person]. (Note that this goes down for larger areas because resistors in parallel have less resistance.) Furthermore, it says that if the voltage exceeds about 150V dielectric breakdown occurs in the skin, wihch lowers resistivity more. For hand to hand connection dry contanct at 125V (AC I guess), they give 1125 to 2875ohms as the 5% to 95% percentile range with a mean of 1625ohms. This is much lower than you have guessed. Here's the typical data on which IEC bases its safety recommendations:
As you said yourself, 2.2 mA will flow in your example. That's a lot of current inside your body. It will be painful at best, and can easily kill you if across a vital organ like the heart.
Connecting two fingers on the same hand to the socket pins would merely be stupid, painful, and cause injury. Connecting between two fingers of opposite hands can possibly be lethal.
And, this is assuming 100 kΩ total skin resistance. That is a plausible number when your hands are quite dry, but much less resistance is also quite possible.
Don't go poking fingers into electrical outlets
If you decide to do it anyway, let the Darwin awards people know first so that you can be properly recognized posthumously.
Hmmm. I'll go digging for sources (I had some when I was instructing in laboratories decades back and should find some by next month anyway), but what I recall is that the most dangerous region for shock (which is primarily concerned with conduction through the heart, since blood is where most of the electrolytes are at and most internal conduction thus follows the blood vessels) is between 10mA and either 1 Amp or 100 mA.
This was required reading for my work in a high voltage laboratory, as was the charming tale of how many solid concrete walls a 3000 PSI A cylinder could launch itself through if you didn't chain it to the wall, and the valve broke off when it fell over.
I think Olin's claim for 2.2mA across the heart being lethal falls down, being half of what GFCI's are set to trigger at (5 mA, at least USA-versions.) That level is half the lower end of the most dangerous range, not more than twice what it would take to kill you, or there would not be a lot of point in GFCIs. The "low skin resistance body model" is also where the "safe" voltages come from, based on potential current through the heart IIRC. No, I'm not volunteering to test it (though I have once or twice involuntarily done so and been lucky), but I think more or less accurately knowing what's going on beats inaccurate fear-mongering. Don't go poking your fingers into outlets, but do that because your skin resistance is not a fixed number you can depend on, especially if you cut your finger on a sharp part of the outlet; and it's stupid to put your finger in an outlet, which really should be sufficient all by itself.
Below 10mA, the current is claimed to be insufficient to cause fibrillation (an induced heat attack and the major cause of death by electrocution.) Above the high end the current is enough to stop/clamp the heart, and it's more likely to restart than in the "most dangerous region" though there can be other bad side effects such as burns inside the blood vessels - this tends to be where the folks that survive lightning strikes land, IIRC.
As already mentioned, skin resistance is HIGHLY variable with sweat (salt-water more or less) having a large influence. Cuts remove it entirely.
As for WRB's 47 uA pacemaker, I submit that the pacemaker might be a rather different deal than any normal source of shock - or there was indeed an error there.
Might be my memory is a little pessimistic:
This one claims a much higher (10X) threshold: https://www.physics.ohio-state.edu/~p616/safety/fatal_current.html
This one mentions 6-9 mA as the threshold of "freezing" (spasming) muscles, which of course leads to that delightful "can't let go" condition, but also reaches higher for death:http://www.elcosh.org/document/1624/888/d000543/section2.html
This one gets into example with skin resistance varying, and does include "5mA as the maximum current generally considered 'harmless'": http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/shock.html
You might be interested in this description of skin resistance. Please note that skin resistance can be in the neighborhood of 1000 ohms when wet. Likewise, electrical burns cause the local skin resistance to drop, so that can contribute. "Skin conductance can increase by several orders of magnitude in milliseconds." Source
It's also important to keep in mind that the current path has to include the heart or lungs to cause immediate death, and so the other point of contact has to be kept in mind - usually the other hand or the feet (standing in wet conditions). If the environment it wet, it seems likely that the contacting fingers might be wet as well. The heart is actually quite sensitive to current applied directly to it, with currents less than 1 mA being seen as hazardous. Current standards take this into account in the certifications for medical equipment, but I remember in the mid-60s reading of a case of an externally powered pacemaker accident (improper power supply grounding and patient touched a grounded metal bedframe) which was lethal at 47 uA. Net discussions of microshock seem convinced that such cases are apocryphal, but I stand by my memory. Although the original article may have been in error.
You are making two errors here.
First, the current must both get in and get out--if the skin resistance is 100k and you're touching a ground somewhere you're actually looking at only 1.1ma. You'll feel it but it won't hurt you. (I have actually felt this when trying to plug in a wall wart in a very awkward position and somehow unknowingly touching both sides of the plug when I thought I was gripping the body of the wart.) (If you're not touching a ground anywhere and use only one hand the current won't flow at all and you won't be hurt. This is why you sometimes see pros working on a live circuit and living to tell about it. Leave such things to the pros!)
Second, you are basically betting your life that the skin resistance is really 100k. That can change drastically if your skin is even a little bit wet and suppose there's a tiny burr on whatever you touched that poked ever so slightly into your skin--that will drive the resistance way down.