0
\$\begingroup\$

In March of 2003 Circuit Cellar published a feature article on using position sensing detectors (PSD). The project builds a 2D position sensor using a PIC16F873 as the microcontroller, an Aculux PCB set and a Hamamatsu PSD. Since that project is now over 10 years old, what modern project or device configuration can I use to get the same or better functionality?

\$\endgroup\$
4
  • \$\begingroup\$ What are your criteria for "better functionality"? Response time, accuracy, resolution, distance, light-level, ...? \$\endgroup\$
    – gbulmer
    Dec 23, 2015 at 17:40
  • \$\begingroup\$ @gbulmer I am mostly interested in a slightly better resolution. The Circuit Cellar project has a 0.001" resolution and ideally I would like an instrument which would clearly resolve deviations of 0.0001" (10x better resolution) \$\endgroup\$ Dec 23, 2015 at 17:43
  • \$\begingroup\$ 10x is quite a lot better. Would your application use a laser like the original Circuit Cellar article (I assume it is "2-D Optical Position Sensor" by Roger Johnson & Chris Lentz) \$\endgroup\$
    – gbulmer
    Dec 23, 2015 at 18:18
  • \$\begingroup\$ @gbulmer I guess I would be willing to use whatever kind of laser is required. I have a Bosch laser level which is similar to the one in the project, but higher quality. Its stated accuracy is 1/4" in 75 feet or 0.0025" in 9 inches. \$\endgroup\$ Dec 23, 2015 at 18:34

1 Answer 1

1
\$\begingroup\$

That is still a good approach. If the terrain is even, like a hard floor, a laser mouse sensor is a good option.

On the extremely complicated end, computation and algorithms have come a long way, so things like LIDAR or Microsoft Kinect for room navigation is much more feasible. But for low-end sensing, I don't think there is much difference now.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.