0
\$\begingroup\$

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=25&v=d3bF2v056WU

http://i.imgur.com/ipDYgd8.png

I'm going to ask about some names. You could say "they are just names" but if I get some context for the names, its going to going to be a good start to clearing some of my other confusions and understanding the intent of the circuit/ checking if my interpretation of the circuit is actually correct

  1. In what sense is the lenient MUX, "lenient"

My understanding of a MUX: Basically its a truth table. The inputs of S tell you what row of the truth table to go to.

So on what sense does adding a feedback for one output to one row of a truth table (am I wrong about we are feeding back to one row of a truth table) make the MUX "lenient" ?

Also I can't seem to find the term "lenient mux" outside the course's materials

  1. What is meant by "load" and "load signal" ?

http://i.imgur.com/ipDYgd8.png

"the select line of the MUX will become the memory component's load signal"

My interpretation of the circuit in the picture is that S will either tell the device to hold onto its current value Q or accept a new one. So my interpretation of S is like its a key that tells locks or unlocks the path to accept a new value.

In what sense are we "loading" and how is S the load signal? We can only store one value Q at a time it seems so it seems we are not loading but setting a value

  1. Why is S controlled by a gate? Whose gate?
\$\endgroup\$
1
\$\begingroup\$

I am not sure about the 'lenient' part, but for the "load signal", you've misinterpreted the sense of "load".

In this case it doesn't mean "electrical load" or "resistive load" -- rather it is "the signal that 'loads' the value of D into the memory."


Taking a shot at 'lenient': this may mean that it does not have oscillation problems between the input and the output when connecting it this way. A bad situation would develop if during a transition there is enough delay and enough gain between the input and output that a self-sustaining oscillation develops. But it is not a term I'm familiar with in this context.

\$\endgroup\$
-1
\$\begingroup\$

You could checkout this MIT lecture for the answer to the "lenient Multiplexer" part of your question.

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ Welcome to EE.SE. While an MIT link may be safer than most, on Stack Exchange we generally expect answers to contain a body themselves and only refer to links for further reading. Doubtless this is why someone already down-voted. You can edit your answer and flesh out some of the information in the lecture, potentially giving a better voting score in the end. \$\endgroup\$ – Asmyldof Feb 18 '16 at 22:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.