I'm having a bit of trouble understanding currrent limiting resistors in simple LED circuits. I know that I can determine the optimal resistor like so:

\$\displaystyle R=\frac{V_{s}-V_{f}}{I_{f}}\$

But I'm having a hard time understanding how this one value modifies the voltage and the current to the correct values for the LED. For example, if my calcuations for a super bright blue LED (with \$V_{f}\$ being 3.0-3.4 V and \$I_{f}\$ being 80 mA, and a voltage source of 5 V) gives me 25 ohms (using the lower bound of the forward voltage), that's fine. So the current throughout should be 80 mA and the voltage drop for the resistor and LED should be 2 and 3 volts, respectively.

But what if I used a 100 ohm resistor instead? Or any other value—how would I calculate the voltage drops and current? Would I assume one of them stays the same?


2 Answers 2


The LED forward voltage drop will remain (roughly) the same, but the current can change, so the calculation becomes (same equation solving for I):

$$I_{LED} = {(V_s - V_f)\over{R}}$$

So for a 3V \${V_f}\$ and a 5V supply, the \$100\Omega\$ resistor would give \${(5V - 3V)\over{100 \Omega }} = 20 mA\$.

So if you know what current you want, just plug the values in, e.g. for 10mA:

$$R = {(5V - 3V)\over{0.01 A}} = {200 \Omega}$$

Basically, the fact that the supply and the LED forward voltage can be relied upon to be pretty static, means that whatever value resistor you put in will also have a static voltage across it (e.g ~2V in this case), so it just leaves you to find out that voltage and select a resistance value according to the current you want.

Below is the V-I curve of a diode (from the wiki LED page), notice the current sharply rises (exponentially) but voltage stays roughly the same when the "on" voltage is reached.

Diode curve

For more accurate control of the current you would use a constant current, which is what most LED driver ICs provide.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Ok this makes sense, when I connected a 10k resistor to experiment the voltage drops went from 2-3 to 2.5-2.5 (and the LED was very dim), so the high resistance must have brought the voltage drop of the LED left near the beginning of the curve. But otherwise I can assume the voltage to be static, or solve graphically if possible. Thanks I think I understand now. \$\endgroup\$
    – mk12
    Commented Oct 23, 2011 at 22:05

To help you understand what is going on, try this.

Assuming a 5-volt supply, put two LEDs in forward series. No resistor. Add power. What happens is that both light up. And the current is limited by the emission of light. No resistor.

As long as you don't exceed the combined forward voltages of the LEDs they will limit their own current based on the power output capacity.

You can also use normal 1N914-like diodes to act as resistors, each having 0.7 volts forward drop. With 5 volts you can use three 1N914 diodes and an LED without blowing out the junctions. Now envision removing a diode. Or adding one.

The 'resistance' in the LED above 0.7 volts is a virtual resistance in that it is real, but not due to a carbon element but the junction is emitting light at a certain power level. Which is the current times the forward voltage (times an efficiency level).


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.