Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for electronics and electrical engineering professionals, students, and enthusiasts. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
I have a design that does not have enough vertical clearance for a standard RJ45 socket. I'm hoping to use a connector like this one from Molex.
I will use Cat5e cable when building my cable with the alternative plug.
The question I have is what considerations need to be made when doing this from an impedance, signal integrity, and EMC perspective? (especially at gigabit speeds)
Here is my take: gigabit Ethernet is 125Mbaud, around 80MHz bandwidth, my guess of edge rate of a couple ns, edge travel distance of 1/3 of a meter. That should be a lot longer than the travel distance of the transition through the connector system. So the exact impedance does not matter that much.
Of course you want to avoid connectors with excessive capacitance and inductance. I think one way to check that is to measure the travel distance of the signal from the termination point at the PCB to the point where the cable unraveled. If that is shorter than the compliant RJ45 set up, then it is probably no worse than the RJ45 arrangement.
This also points out that when terminating the cable to the mating connector, it is necessary to control how much the cable get unraveled (un-twisted).
By the way, in the old days, PCB terminated RJ45 jacks almost always have the spring contacts on top (locking tap at the bottom). So the wire of a contact has to travel to the back of the jack and then down to the PCB. Now most jacks are flipped "upside down" so the traveling path becomes significantly shorter.
