0
\$\begingroup\$

I would like to measure the capacitance between two random pieces of metal. Also, I would like to monitor the changes in such capacitance as people walk by those metal objects. Can a cheap off-the-shelf meter do this?

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ More information needed - two random pieces of metal means nothing - who decides if they are random or not. What distance are the people from the metal objects and what might the metal objects look like dimensionally? How far away can your electronics be? What form does the output take. What response time is needed? What temperature changes could there be and what humidity is around the objects? \$\endgroup\$ – Andy aka Feb 3 '16 at 14:51
  • \$\begingroup\$ Possible duplicate of Measure small capacitance value \$\endgroup\$ – Dmitry Grigoryev Sep 17 '18 at 6:52
3
\$\begingroup\$

Another way to detect such capacitance changes is to build the capacitor into an L-C oscillator (such as from a radio) and measure its frequency. RF oscillators are usually better than 555 timers if the capacitance is much below 100pf.

You may have to compensate for temperature and other causes of frequency drift but these are usually relatively slow compared to the effects you want to measure.

\$\endgroup\$
1
\$\begingroup\$

A typical way to measure small changes in capacitance is to use an AC bridge circuit. My experience with those has been less than stellar, and I avoid them.

A better way, IMO, is to use an oscillator with a duty cycle or frequency that is linearly dependent on a capacitance, and measure the timing parameters of the resulting waveform. A 555 timer in astable mode is an OK way to do this.

That would serve as fine glue circuitry to put into a capture-compare peripheral on a microcontroller to suck the timing information out of. A dirt cheap 8-bit 8-pin PIC would be up to the task.

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ So there is no off-the-shelf meter that would measure such a thing? An no off-the-shelf logger? \$\endgroup\$ – Justin Feb 23 '16 at 22:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.