1
\$\begingroup\$

This is an 11-way connector pair from inside a standalone induction hob. It comprises a cable-mounted female part and a PCB mounted male part.

cable photograph 1

cable photograph 2

cable photograph 3

(Corrected due to sloppy original measuring - thanks @Passerby) Pitch is 2.5mm and pin length appears to be around 3.3mm. The female part is about 4mm wide and 8mm tall. Does anyone recognise this system?

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ Try Molex - they make em like this. \$\endgroup\$ – Andy aka Feb 10 '16 at 15:05
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thanks Andy - do you have a range name / number as a starting point? No worries if not, wouldn't be the first time I have trawled their catalogue! \$\endgroup\$ – stefandz Feb 10 '16 at 15:06
  • \$\begingroup\$ @OleksandrR. The housing seems a lot smaller than that. \$\endgroup\$ – stefandz Feb 10 '16 at 15:16
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Are you sure its 2.54 and not slightly smaller? \$\endgroup\$ – Passerby Feb 10 '16 at 15:20
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Passerby I think you're right - I was seeing what I wanted to see. More diligent measuring (outer pin edge to outer pin edge less measured width of pin / (numPositions - 1)) gave 2.5mm. Looks like it is the JST XH. \$\endgroup\$ – stefandz Feb 10 '16 at 15:26
5
\$\begingroup\$

Without precise measurements it's a little hard to tell, but I am pretty sure that its a JST XH series connector. A datasheet for these connectors can be found here.

The OP has since tested and confirmed this to be the correct part.

\$\endgroup\$
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ If OP's measurements of 2.54 are true, then these are not a match. \$\endgroup\$ – Passerby Feb 10 '16 at 15:20
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Passerby Why exactly? The only measurements provided are the pitch (which matches) and the pin length (which OP claims are only 3.3mm long but looking at the photos they seem a bit longer) \$\endgroup\$ – jms Feb 10 '16 at 15:27
  • \$\begingroup\$ @jms taking a look at the datasheet you link, the pitch is 2.5, not 2.54mm. My mistake, but your answer looks correct allowing for that. \$\endgroup\$ – stefandz Feb 10 '16 at 15:31
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @stefandz To be honest I didn't trust in the precision of your measurements, as anything close to 2.5 mm is easily interpreted as 0.1". I looked at the photo and compared it to stuff in my parts box, then double checked with the datasheet. \$\endgroup\$ – jms Feb 10 '16 at 15:42
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Passerby Absolutely true, and I worded my reply quite badly. I should have said "which matches assuming less than perfect accuracy of measurement". I was going to, but the edit time limit caught up with me. \$\endgroup\$ – jms Feb 10 '16 at 16:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.