I'd like to understand why the ISO 14443 standard describes two types of interfaces, type A and type B.

This answer talks about competing technologies brought forward by two different companies: https://electronics.stackexchange.com/a/189164/103209. Can I find more details somewhere?

Thank you :)

| improve this question | | | | |

I found a nice answer to my question here: http://www.secureidnews.com/news-item/is-the-debate-still-relevant-an-in-depth-look-at-iso-14443-and-its-competing-interface-types/

Short summary of the article:

The first interface was type A, supported by Mikron and their Mifare technology, later bought by Philips (NXP). Some limitations quickly occurred: the initial implementation was a memory card, and not a microprocessor card. At the time, type A couldn't power up a microprocessor continuously. The Innovatron company had working microprocessor cards, so their technology was integrated as type B in the standard. This separation is not relevant anymore since you can have type A or type B memory or microprocessor cards, and we ended up with two competing technologies in the same standard.

As a final note, on Figure 2 of the ISO 14443-2 we can see that newer and faster bit rates all use the type B modulation and coding (BPSK and NRZ-L). Maybe in an effort to phase out type A?

| improve this answer | | | | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.