I'd like to understand why the ISO 14443 standard describes two types of interfaces, type A and type B.
This answer talks about competing technologies brought forward by two different companies: https://electronics.stackexchange.com/a/189164/103209. Can I find more details somewhere?
Thank you :)
I found a nice answer to my question here: http://www.secureidnews.com/news-item/is-the-debate-still-relevant-an-in-depth-look-at-iso-14443-and-its-competing-interface-types/
Short summary of the article:
The first interface was type A, supported by Mikron and their Mifare technology, later bought by Philips (NXP). Some limitations quickly occurred: the initial implementation was a memory card, and not a microprocessor card. At the time, type A couldn't power up a microprocessor continuously. The Innovatron company had working microprocessor cards, so their technology was integrated as type B in the standard. This separation is not relevant anymore since you can have type A or type B memory or microprocessor cards, and we ended up with two competing technologies in the same standard.
As a final note, on Figure 2 of the ISO 14443-2 we can see that newer and faster bit rates all use the type B modulation and coding (BPSK and NRZ-L). Maybe in an effort to phase out type A?
