As far as I know, SCRs are basically the DC-only cousin of a TRIAC. However, in my travels I have not encountered a TRIAC being much different in price than a similarly spec'd SCR, so I guess I don't really understand the point of SCRs from an applications point of view.

To clarify, I understand the fundamental differences in operation between the devices, but I don't see why, from an applications point of view why SCRs would even be manufactured. It seems that if you buy an SCR, you are buying half the "features" of a TRIAC for approximately the same price. In what instance would you only want to use an SCR? Is it merely that you want to only conduct an AC waveform in one direction?


2 Answers 2


While you may have undoubtedly found a load of principes of operation of SCR vs TRIAC it seems you miss out, at least (but likely not limited to):

  • The Recovery Time of a Thyristor Type (the family of devices): If your signal might reverse quicker than the Thyristor can recover in the case of an SCR it will still return to blocking state ("eventually"), as long reverse voltages and rates of change are below where it permanently breaks. A TRIAC will just conduct in the opposite direction as well, as it remains broken down until it "relaxes" long enough = The charge carriers "settle down".
  • Reactive Loads Causing a high rate of change of Commutation Voltage might also trigger a TRIAC to turn back on on the return cycle, due to current and voltage being out of phase. If the current 'turns off' the voltage is high (already in reverse from phase change), this then stimulates the charge carriers in a TRIAC to not go back to rest (blocking state). This is a problem significantly smaller in SCRs. Here a Snubber Circuit may help a TRIAC cope to certain limits.
  • A rectifier fed inductive load, or very high load current may do the opposite of the previous point: A high rate of change of commutation current, which then causes similar problems. In the case of rectifier fed inductance you might choose to build the rectifier up of 2 diodes and 2 SCRs in stead, to again mitigate the risk. Here a snubber circuit would not help much with a TRIAC.
  • An SCR may (MAY) at a similar cost be less sensitive to thermal effects on its blocking/off-breakdown voltage, but this depends a lot on the internal build up of the TRIAC in question.
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thank you, those are all very good points that I was unaware of. \$\endgroup\$ Apr 1, 2016 at 14:28

Triacs are extremely handy, but they have their limitations. The biggest is speed. At 60 Hz, for non-inductive loads which are not too great (<40-50 amps) they rule. At higher frequencies, or with inductive loads, their slow turn-off can be a real problem, and in general they are not suited for industrial (high-current) applications.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.