0
\$\begingroup\$

So I'm aware that there are some high speed RF SPDT switches e.g. Single-Pole Double-Throw (SPDT) switch offering 20nS switching time. I'm interested in a switch like the following picture. This is related to a wireless scheme called Generalized Spatial Modulation.

Basically, I'm wondering how such a switch is constructed (can we make it from SPDT switches)?

Note here that the poles can connect to any of the antennas (however the case where two poles connect to the same antenna would not be used in practice.) enter image description here

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ Are you looking for a DPDT switch? \$\endgroup\$ – scld Apr 5 '16 at 19:36
  • \$\begingroup\$ No, for two reasons. 1) A DPDT switch connects each input to one of two possible outputs. In the figure you can see each input should be able to connect to ANY of the 4 outputs. 2) An individual input should be able to be switched to any of the outputs independently of the other input being switched. \$\endgroup\$ – user67081 Apr 5 '16 at 20:40
  • \$\begingroup\$ If your looking for 1 channel to 4 channels, its called a multiplexer \$\endgroup\$ – Voltage Spike Apr 5 '16 at 21:48
  • \$\begingroup\$ At a high level, multiplexers like that could very well be made with a series of SPDT switches. The specifics would depend highly on your bandwidth needs. \$\endgroup\$ – scld Apr 6 '16 at 13:36
  • \$\begingroup\$ @scld I'm trying to understand how fast these multiplexers can function in order to do some analysis. For a simple SPDT switch 20nS is a reasonable number, but for a 2x4 switch that I've shown before I have no idea what the switching times would be. \$\endgroup\$ – user67081 Apr 6 '16 at 19:23
0
\$\begingroup\$

It's a crude drawing, however it gets the point across. You can make the 2x4 blocking switch matrix with 10 SPDTs. The total max switching time (assuming you were OK with switching them all at once) would be the switching time of your slowest switch.

Realistically, with setting times and differences in propagation of your control signal, you'd probably need to add a few nanoseconds on. But, you're still in the same order of magnitude.

2x4 Switch Matrix

|improve this answer|||||
\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

A switch where there are ≥2 “inputs” and ≥2 “outputs” and there can be simultaneous connections from any input to any output is called a crossbar switch. A quick search for “RF crossbar switch” suggest that they do exist as products, but are sold at the “if you have to ask, you can't afford it” level, which I assume you're not looking for based on your tag.


If you were to build your own, the simplest approach would be to just construct the obvious electrical paths (two SP4T switches and four T-junctions), out of manual switches, relays, or electronic switching (e.g. PIN diodes).

The key part of such construction is to keep the length of all components with the improper impedance (in particular the inactive stubs of the T-junctions) much smaller than the shortest wavelength of interest, to avoid undesired reflections.

If you were to use four SPDT switches instead of passive T-junctions, and the switches themselves had the proper impedance, then you would avoid having any unwanted stubs and get better performance (limited by the specs of the switches). This increases the cost due to needing more switches, and also requires control logic to set the extra switches consistently.

Another feature you might want is to either short or terminate the two-of-four unconnected ports. This might require additional switching (I'm not sure exactly how much but it should be a simple “logic puzzle” to work out) unless you can get it as a feature in your SP4T switches, which you might if they're designed for RF switching.


Finally, I'd like to note (in case you're not already aware) that if you want to experiment with the possible topologies of switch networks without putting together a custom PCB design, that there are such things as coaxial relays, which typically come with SMA ports and terminals for the DC control signals, so all you need to add is some jumpers, a power source, and regular switches for control.

Of course, they're going to be more expensive than board-mount switches, but I've seen a lot of them available as surplus/used.

|improve this answer|||||
\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ I'm just a ham, and I haven't particularly studied RF circuit design (as opposed to plugging things together). Please point out any omissions or bad ideas in this answer! \$\endgroup\$ – Kevin Reid Apr 5 '16 at 22:48
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thanks Kevin, this is good info. I'm not necessarily interested in building such a switch, more like understanding it's theoretical switching performance. E.g. I know how fast SPDT switches can be, how much of a performance degradation happens when using crossbars. I'll have to do some more research to figure this out. \$\endgroup\$ – user67081 Apr 6 '16 at 19:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.