1
\$\begingroup\$

Scenario

I have current carrying conductor with a current transformer around it. If the load is rated at 5V, 2A and only requires 2W of power, but the primary side conductor is carrying 100V 12A.

Question

In this scenario would the power rating of the transformer be determined by the load or the primary side rating. AKA would I need a transformer core rated at 1200VA or 10VA.

Background

I am designing an energy harvesting unit to power my Raspberry Pi

enter image description here

I am aware that regulatory circuitry will be needed, but let's omit that for now. I plan to use a switch mode power converter for regulation, shown in diagram above.

Some proof would be great as I have heard conflicting answers to this question.

\$\endgroup\$
6
  • \$\begingroup\$ If you are pulling 10VA out of the secondary and putting 1200VA into the primary then something is very wrong with that transformer and I wouldn't use it. The VA rating of a transformer is the maximum allowable load, not the load you are actually taking. The actual input VA will be very close to the output VA but slightly higher as no transformer is 100% efficient. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 23, 2016 at 14:41
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ The idea is to power a raspberry pi using a current transformer base energy harvesting system. \$\endgroup\$
    – dxpelou
    Commented Apr 23, 2016 at 14:55
  • \$\begingroup\$ What is important is the current × voltage with respect to the current transformer, not with respect to the main series load. Although current in the primary winding is the same as through the main load, the voltage across it isn't. \$\endgroup\$
    – jippie
    Commented Apr 23, 2016 at 14:55
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Interesting idea for harvesting energy, but you are aware that the power consumed by the PRi is no longer powering the main load? You can't create power out of nothing. On this stack we obey the laws of thermodynamics. \$\endgroup\$
    – jippie
    Commented Apr 23, 2016 at 14:59
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ If you have 12A on the primary and want 2A on the secondary, you need a 6:1 transformer. If you want 5V on the secondary, then the primary will have a voltage drop of 0.833V. \$\endgroup\$
    – Dave Tweed
    Commented Apr 23, 2016 at 15:25

3 Answers 3

1
\$\begingroup\$

I have current carrying conductor with a current transformer around it. If the load is rated at 5V, 2A and only requires 2W of power, but the primary side conductor is carrying 100V 12A.

The first problem is that the CT primary current will vary from 0 at no load to a maximum depending on the load on the line. This makes it very difficult to extract even power from such a scheme and it is the reason that constant voltage is the preferred method of power distribution.

I understand that constant current power is used for runway lighting with CTs driving lights along the sides of the runway. The advantage is that there is no drop in lamp power at the far end of the runway as the current is constant throughout. Note that the current is constant and that changes everything!

Back to your question:

You are proposing to draw \$ 5 V \times 2 A = 10 W \$. The nearest standard type might be a 50:5 A unit such as an INSTRUMENT TRANSFORMER 15RL-500 Current Transformer, 50:5, 50 A available from Farnell / Newark. A quick look through the datasheet shows:

enter image description here

Figure 1. Note the maximum burden is 2.5 VA on this CT.

That's not enough power so we need to go bigger.

enter image description here

Figure 2. This one can handle a 12.5 VA burden.

Let's use this one. Note that you've now spent $50 to $100. (I can't find a price.)

To get 5 A out of the secondary we'll need 200 A in the primary but we only have 12 A in our circuit. Let's wind the primary through the core to increase the ampere-turns closer to 200. \$ \frac {200 Aturns}{12 A} = 16.66~turns \$. Since you can only have integer turns let's go for 16. Now 12 A on the primary will give us \$ \frac {5}{200} 12 \cdot 16 = 4.8~A \$ on the secondary.

The maximum secondary voltage we can get is given by \$ \frac {VA~rating}{max~current} = \frac {12.5}{4.8} = 2.6~V \$. Now we can see that this is getting awkward. 2.6 V RMS (it's AC, remember) isn't a great starting point for an efficient low-voltage PSU.

Add to this the problems of variable current and ensuring that, should the current increase for some reason, that you don't exceed the VA rating of the transformer and you can see that the exercise becomes far from trivial and far from cheap.

By the way, your secondary impedance, \$ \frac {2.6V}{4.8A} = 0.54~\Omega \$ will be reflected back to the primary as \$ R_P = R_S (\frac {N_P}{N_S})^2 = 0.54 (\frac {16}{40})^2 = 0.086~\Omega \$ and this will cause a \$ V = IR = 12 \cdot 0.086 = 1.04~V \$ drop in voltage to your mains load.

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

Background: I am designing an energy harvesting unit to power my Raspberry Pi.

No you're not. Harvesting suggests that you're getting energy that would otherwise be wasted. This is a complex way of connecting a load to a mains supply. As you can see, power is drawn from the mains and you (or someone else, if you're stealing it) will have to pay for it.

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • \$\begingroup\$ Great answer once again! I am a student trying to piece together a design proposal, for a current monitoring system of overhead transmission lines, not stealing energy haha. I guess the raspberry pi is too much of a power hungry device to design a suitable psu for. \$\endgroup\$
    – dxpelou
    Commented Apr 23, 2016 at 22:43
  • \$\begingroup\$ See Andy's comment to my query on his post. He's more of a magnet head than me. He may elaborate his answer. \$\endgroup\$
    – Transistor
    Commented Apr 23, 2016 at 22:49
  • \$\begingroup\$ You are not factoring-in the primary magnetization inductance - it will shunt the reflected secondary impedance from the load. \$\endgroup\$
    – Andy aka
    Commented Apr 23, 2016 at 23:23
1
\$\begingroup\$

When you clamp a current transformer around a current carrying wire it would be totally expected that the current through the wire to the load wouldn't drop hardly at all i.e. the current in the wire would remain at least 99.9% what is was before the CT was clamped around it.

This means that the extra volt drop in the wire is going to be micro volts or a milli volt at worst case. So you have a wire carrying 12A passing through a CT and the CT primary (yes it's a still a primary winding) sees maybe 1 mV.

That's a power input to the CT of about 12 mW. That would normally be dissipated in the CTs burden but now you have a circuit instead of a burden BUT it will still only receive 12 mW of power.

Is that enough for a raspberry Pi?

No.

\$\endgroup\$
7
  • \$\begingroup\$ A microcontroller, primarily in a sleep state, sure. But a full-fledged Pi, with HDMI graphics, definitely not. May almost be better off with a mains-powered transformer and wide-input-range regulator. And "5V, 2A" is not 2W, but 10W. Even though a load may state less, design for 10W due to inrush current, transient current, etc. \$\endgroup\$
    – rdtsc
    Commented Apr 23, 2016 at 18:48
  • \$\begingroup\$ This confuses the hell out of me, i would assume this would be the case for a short circuit at the output of the transformer? Not in the case with a load. Can you expand on why i would only receive 12mW power out? \$\endgroup\$
    – dxpelou
    Commented Apr 23, 2016 at 21:59
  • \$\begingroup\$ Just think about how much voltage the thick wire carrying the current has developed across the 1cm length passing thru the CT. It's got nothing to do with anything else. \$\endgroup\$
    – Andy aka
    Commented Apr 23, 2016 at 22:07
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Andyaka: Surely if we're taking 10 W from the CT secondary then we're taking 10 W from the primary conductor? \$ \frac {10 VA}{12A} = 0.83~V \$ drop in voltage exiting the CT. It becomes a resistor / impedance no matter how thick the wire is. ;^) \$\endgroup\$
    – Transistor
    Commented Apr 23, 2016 at 22:24
  • \$\begingroup\$ @transistor great theory for a perfect CT but primary magnetization inductance kills the dream. \$\endgroup\$
    – Andy aka
    Commented Apr 23, 2016 at 22:34
1
\$\begingroup\$

Your challenges are going to be having a regular supply of power to your 'regulator' circuit or whatever follows the current transformer.

You cannot use a regular transformer for this application (it would turn out massive and inefficient).

If your main current was always between 10 and 100A you could then be sure you will always have enough to power your device through a suitable current transformer.

You need to size your current transformer based on the maximum current it will pass in practice, including inrush and such but not more than your circuit fuses.

You need to make sure you have the correct turns ratio so that the output current is close to your device current when the main load is consuming the minimum expected current.

You would them locate or develop a shunt voltage regulator (with credible safety features) that will prevent excessive voltage or current excursions in your regulator circuit or in the current transformer. A pair of anti-parallel high wattage Zener diodes greater than your device requirements in series with a resistor that will limit the current transformer secondary voltage if your shunt regulator fails or the protection fuse opens. Your shunt regulator should be able to handle the maximum expected current transformer secondary current.

This is not a very common application but perhaps there are circuits out there that you could copy or work from.

Here are a couple of pages that may give ideas. I found them with a google image search just now but have not tried to establish the direct relevance.

https://sound-au.com/project79.htm

http://www.electronicproducts.com/Power_Products/Batteries_and_Fuel_Cells/Energy_harvesting_from_an_ambient_electric_field.aspx

http://www.discovercircuits.com/DJ-Circuits/energy-harvesting.htm

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • \$\begingroup\$ Well thought out! Why would i not be able to use a regular transformer? and what do you mean by regular? \$\endgroup\$
    – dxpelou
    Commented Apr 23, 2016 at 22:02
  • \$\begingroup\$ You would not have a pactical turns ratio and the current in the primary would saturate a small transformer if it had a lot of primary turns. It would also need to be rated on the primary at the mains load current. \$\endgroup\$
    – KalleMP
    Commented Apr 25, 2016 at 9:40
  • \$\begingroup\$ There are IoT devices that run for a year+ on a coin cell and support Bluetooth, they could instead be powered with simple powersupplies like this and provide current monitoring. \$\endgroup\$
    – KalleMP
    Commented Apr 25, 2016 at 9:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.