From a Data Comms textbook:

These are the approximate square waves (Fig 3.7a and 3.7b): enter image description here

This is where the effect of changes in bandwidth on data rate is determined:

enter image description here enter image description here

The problem is the explanation/calculation makes no sense to me. I don't see anything in the calculation that ties the bandwidth of the channel to the data rate that was eventually calculated. All they did was take the toggling rate (frequency) of the square wave and multiply it by 2 to get the data rate; nothing that explains how increasing bandwidth increased the data rate.

What I understood previously is that the main reason increasing bandwidth allows higher data rate is because as high bandwidth allows transmission of more frequency components, which in turn allows the receiver to better distinguish between 1 and 0 and ultimately allowing the data source to increase its toggling rate (i.e. data rate) since it knows the receiver can handle it. My questions are:

  • What have I missed in the textbook's explanation, if anything; or is it just a poor explanation?
  • Is there anything wrong with my understanding of the bandwidth-data rate relationship?
  • And just to clarify, the bandwidth considered here is the bandwidth of the channel and not that of the input signal? (though I know the channel's bandwidth does affect the signal bandwidth by limiting it)



1 Answer 1


Reword Case II like this:

Now suppose \$f=2\ \mathrm{MHz}\$. Then, using the same line of reasoning as before, the bandwidth of the signal is <...equation...> = 8 MHz. But in this case \$T = 1/f = 0.5\ \mu\mathrm{s}\$. As a result, one bit occurs every 0.25 us for a rate of 4 Mbps. Thus other things being equal, by doubling the bandwidth we double the potential bit rate.

In the original version they kind of put the cart before the horse by "supposing" the higher bandwidth, instead of starting with the frequency and showing how that implies a higher bandwidth.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.