0
\$\begingroup\$

I have the following LTI sinusoidal circuit, and I am trying to derive its differential equation using KCL and/or KVL. I need this to derive the Power Factor as function of the components, so I can optimize it. Solving the equations is generally no problem.

I already asked a similar question a while ago, but what got me confused this time is that my teacher said that I should end up with two equations, one depending on C and the other depending on L, but that is not what I derived.

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

If I am correct:

$$i(t) = i_{C1} + i_{L1} + i_R$$ With $$i_R = i_{L2} = i_{C2}$$

$$v(t) = v_{C1} + v_{L1} + v_{R} + v_{L2} + v_{C2}$$

But if I use the i(t), and derive the differential equation, then I find the same equation of a simple parallel RLC-circuit. This does not seem correct, and I do not find the two equations my teacher was talking about.

I am allowed to use the identities:

$$v_b(t) = L_b \frac{d i_b (t)}{dt}, i_b (t) = C_b \frac{d v_b (t)}{dt}, v_b (t) = R_b i_b (t)$$ With $$i(t) = I_m \cos(\omega t + \phi_i), v(t) = V_m \cos(\omega t + \phi_v), \phi = \phi_u - \phi_i, etc.$$

I am a math student btw, so unfortunately my circuit-theory knowledge is limited.

\$\endgroup\$
1
\$\begingroup\$

The thing you got wrong here is the Kirchhoff's laws : while you're right on the current laws, you made a little mistake on the voltages : they are equivalent in each parallel wire, so that : $$ v(t) = v_{C1}(t) = v_{L1}(t) = v_R(t)+v_{C2}(t)+v_{L2}(t) $$ Note that these equations are given without regard to the sign and the conventions. This way should lead you to the proper solution. Always remember : the Kirchhoff's laws says that the sum of all the voltages in a loop (closed network) is equal to zero, and that the sum of all currents in a node are equal to zero.

| improve this answer | |
\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ Ah yes you are right! So basically I will get two equations, one depending on C1 and the other on L1 if I solve $$1) v(t) = v_{C1}(t) = v_R(t)+v_{C2}(t)+v_{L2}(t),$$ $$2) v(t) = v_{L1}(t) = v_R(t)+v_{C2}(t)+v_{L2}(t)$$ Right? I am trying it now, but if I am not mistaken, this is quite complex because I of the three different currents? If i try to solve 1) I find this equality? $$i_1 (t) = C1R i_3 (t) + C1L2 \frac{d^2 i_3 (t)}{dt^2} + \frac{C1}{C2} i_3 (t)$$ With $$i_1, i_2, i_3$$ being the current through first, second and third loop, and same for voltage $$v_1, v_2, v_3.$$ \$\endgroup\$ – user260710 May 29 '16 at 0:02
  • \$\begingroup\$ Still can't find it, I really have no idea how to solve this \$\endgroup\$ – user260710 May 29 '16 at 5:09
  • \$\begingroup\$ Do you know about complex impedances ? That is the most efficient way of solving these, by using : $$ L = jL\omega ; C=\frac{1}{jC\omega} $$ And by swapping back in time domain. If you cannot use these, I'm working on a solution now \$\endgroup\$ – Albits May 29 '16 at 9:26
  • \$\begingroup\$ The first equality should give you : $$ i_1(t)=RC1\frac{di_3(t)}{dt}+\frac{C1}{C2}i_3(t)+C1L2\frac{d²i_3(t)}{dt} $$ \$\endgroup\$ – Albits May 29 '16 at 9:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.