3
\$\begingroup\$

I saw an exam question that asked what the advantages of using DSB AM with carrier are. I can't find anything conclusive in my books or by googling.

It seems to me that DSB AM with carrier is less power-efficient (compared to DSB-SC ΑΜ and SSB AM) and that it carries redundant information (compared to SSB AM). The only thing I could interpret as an advantage is perhaps simplicity of demodulation.

So am I missing anything? What are the actual advantages of using DSB AM with carrier?

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Cost of ownership of a million transistor radio receivers using a very simple demodulator is a very big deal. \$\endgroup\$
    – Andy aka
    Jun 11, 2016 at 19:21

1 Answer 1

3
\$\begingroup\$

Simplicity of modulation and demodulation is indeed the chief advantage of DSB-AM -- a DSB-AM signal can use a low level modulator and Class C amps or a high-level final stage modulator with Class C carrier drive, whereas a SSB or DSB-SC signal must be generated low-level with a doubly balanced modulator and amplified linearly, which requires more components and reduces amplifier efficiency.

On the demodulation end, SSB and DSB-SC require either an accurate BFO/carrier inject oscillator or a synchronous demodulator such as a Costas loop, both of which require many more components and are much more expensive than the triviality of a diode demodulator, which only requires a tuned circuit, a sensitive (point-contact "catwhisker" detectors and germanium diodes were used in the bad old days; nowadays, a fast Schottky is the diode of choice) diode, a RC network, and a sensitive earpiece or audio amp.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.