4
\$\begingroup\$

I’ve noticed different MAC/PHY manufacturers have different recommended termination recommendations for their Ethernet front end.

Why does everyone do a variant on the same theme? Does it come down to designer’s preference, or is there a good reason?

I’ve included 3 examples below.

In image 1, the center taps of the transformer are tied to 3.3v and the data lines are terminated to ground through a ~50R resistor and 100nF capacitor. enter image description here Image Source: http://www.siongboon.com/projects/2006-03-06_serial_communication/an-139%20(how%20to%20route%20ethernet%20PCB).pdf

Image 2, the center taps are tied to 3.3v along with the ~50R termination resistors. The advantage I can see here is reduced component count (no 100nF caps to block the DC path). enter image description here Image Source: http://www.nxp.com/files/microcontrollers/doc/app_note/AN2759.pdf

Image 3, this is a bit of a mix of the above two configurations with another small difference thrown in. Only one of the center taps is tied to 3.3V. The other center tap is tied to ground through a capacitor. TX termination resistors are tied to 3.3V, while RX termination resistors are tied to ground through a capacitor. Image Source: http://docs.tibbo.com/soism/index.html?em200_pin_ether.htm enter image description here

\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

It is a strictly hardware dependant issue. All of these PHY layer IC's have 50 ohm differential input and outputs to match the magnetics and ethernet cable. All of these IC's have PECL outputs but inputs can vary as to whether a bias current is needed or not. There are many PHY layer IC's on the market with various CPU/MPU connections, but at the magnetics layer the variations are minor, having mostly to do with bias currents.

What is different is if the 3.3 volt source is built into the IC or is external, including receive and transmit. The slight differences are for impedance matching to a fine degree (including DC blocking caps). The goal is maximum frequency response with little DC bias current in the magnetics.

Internal servo loops and 8bit/10bit conversion keeps DC imbalance in the magnetics to a minimum or bit errors could occur. There are designs where 48vdc is carried over the ethernet cable and taken off the tx and rx center taps for POE (power over ethernet).

\$\endgroup\$
1
\$\begingroup\$

Central tap connection must work together with PHY line driver. Which could vary PHY by PHY and sometimes within single IC. There are basically two types. Current-mode driver and voltage-mode driver which you will meet.

Current-mode driver is essentially open collector type. Hence center tap needs to be connected to supply, or to supply via small resistor value to make it work. Seeing recommended schematic where center tap connects to VCC gives you hint about the PHY driver used. Assuming that driver output impedance is 50R then also the line must be seen as 50R to prevent reflections. This can be achieved by 100R in parallel with the load (trafo 1:1 => load=impedance of the line=100R). These form impedance of 50R. Good practice is to use differential split termination which helps with emi. CM is then suppressed while DM not. However simple 100R in parallel should work as well.

Voltage-mode driver is on the other side characterized by center tap connected to GND via capacitor. But never to supply. That’s because driver itself provides supply. For impedance matching suppliers sometimes recommend to use different resistor values what is confusing (W5500 recommends 2x 82R ?!? for instance). I guess this is given by the fact that PHY output/input is internally forming different impedance than 50R.

voltage-mode and current-mode line drivers

Source of images: Microsemi (Now Microchip) - ENT-AN0106 Application Note, SimpliPHY Architecture Advantages

\$\endgroup\$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.