I've been looking at these tantalum caps for a coin cell operated BLE device, but I'm a little confused by specified leakage current. The datasheet lists the leakage current at <= 0.003CV uA. With a 470uA cap at 6.0V, my calculated leakage current is 0.003 * 0.000470 * 6.0, which is 0.00000846. The datasheet says that current is in uA.

Is the leakage current really 0.00000846uA? Or is the C (capacitive) value in the equation supposed to be in uF, not F? That would make more sense if the leakage current was 8.46uA, although that seems high for a "low leakage" cap.

And yes, I am well aware of the potential dangers of tantalums. Operating voltage is going to be in the 3.0V - 2.0V range. We have a few other (highly experienced) EEs working on this project, and I'm trying to get up the learning curve on some aspects of datasheet specs.

  • \$\begingroup\$ For double checking if some values make sense, you can always measure. \$\endgroup\$
    – PlasmaHH
    Jul 15, 2016 at 13:33
  • \$\begingroup\$ @PlasmaHH Unfortunately, I don't have tantalum caps nearby to try out. Good point, though. \$\endgroup\$
    – CHendrix
    Jul 15, 2016 at 13:36
  • \$\begingroup\$ Try another supplier of similar device to see what they say. \$\endgroup\$
    – Andy aka
    Jul 15, 2016 at 13:38
  • \$\begingroup\$ My 0.02, I would assume the same thing as you, they ment either C in uF or really 0.003CV in A. \$\endgroup\$
    – winny
    Jul 15, 2016 at 13:39
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ A few uA of leakage for a tantalum cap seems realistic. Tantalum have relatively high leakage. Ceramic would have much less, but of course, you can't have such a high capacitance value with ceramic. By the way, are you sure you need such a high capacitance somewhere in a battery-operated device? Seems strange to me. \$\endgroup\$
    – dim
    Jul 15, 2016 at 14:10

1 Answer 1


The formula from the datasheet is leakage = 0.03CV

If you use the capacitance in Farads, then at 6V you have 84.6uA

Table 1 in the datasheet states the maximum leakage for the 470uF cap at 25C is 89uA.

  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Unless you have a guarantee of leakage current, it can be very scattered part-to-part. Measuring won't help unless you measure a lot of them. Then you can do a probability curve. \$\endgroup\$ Jul 15, 2016 at 16:18
  • \$\begingroup\$ Wow. Can't believe I missed that table in the datasheet. \$\endgroup\$
    – CHendrix
    Jul 15, 2016 at 16:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.