0
\$\begingroup\$

I've been looking at these tantalum caps for a coin cell operated BLE device, but I'm a little confused by specified leakage current. The datasheet lists the leakage current at <= 0.003CV uA. With a 470uA cap at 6.0V, my calculated leakage current is 0.003 * 0.000470 * 6.0, which is 0.00000846. The datasheet says that current is in uA.

Is the leakage current really 0.00000846uA? Or is the C (capacitive) value in the equation supposed to be in uF, not F? That would make more sense if the leakage current was 8.46uA, although that seems high for a "low leakage" cap.

And yes, I am well aware of the potential dangers of tantalums. Operating voltage is going to be in the 3.0V - 2.0V range. We have a few other (highly experienced) EEs working on this project, and I'm trying to get up the learning curve on some aspects of datasheet specs.

Improve this question
\$\endgroup\$
5
  • \$\begingroup\$ For double checking if some values make sense, you can always measure. \$\endgroup\$ – PlasmaHH Jul 15 '16 at 13:33
  • \$\begingroup\$ @PlasmaHH Unfortunately, I don't have tantalum caps nearby to try out. Good point, though. \$\endgroup\$ – CHendrix Jul 15 '16 at 13:36
  • \$\begingroup\$ Try another supplier of similar device to see what they say. \$\endgroup\$ – Andy aka Jul 15 '16 at 13:38
  • \$\begingroup\$ My 0.02, I would assume the same thing as you, they ment either C in uF or really 0.003CV in A. \$\endgroup\$ – winny Jul 15 '16 at 13:39
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ A few uA of leakage for a tantalum cap seems realistic. Tantalum have relatively high leakage. Ceramic would have much less, but of course, you can't have such a high capacitance value with ceramic. By the way, are you sure you need such a high capacitance somewhere in a battery-operated device? Seems strange to me. \$\endgroup\$ – dim Jul 15 '16 at 14:10
4
\$\begingroup\$

The formula from the datasheet is leakage = 0.03CV

If you use the capacitance in Farads, then at 6V you have 84.6uA

Table 1 in the datasheet states the maximum leakage for the 470uF cap at 25C is 89uA.

Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
2
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Unless you have a guarantee of leakage current, it can be very scattered part-to-part. Measuring won't help unless you measure a lot of them. Then you can do a probability curve. \$\endgroup\$ – Robert Endl Jul 15 '16 at 16:18
  • \$\begingroup\$ Wow. Can't believe I missed that table in the datasheet. \$\endgroup\$ – CHendrix Jul 15 '16 at 16:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.