As someone new to practical RF design (the theory is easy by comparison!), I have a relatively simple question when it comes to matching networks, and it has to do with best practices.
Obviously, a theoretical match is easy to make with software. What I've generally done is measure the antenna, come up with a suitable matching network design. Then starting at the antenna, I add the components one by one measuring resulting impedance from each new component.
It seems to me, the biggest question is what to do when the results are so far off that the remaining component values are meaningless since they assume an intermediate impedance that just doesn't exist in the real circuit.
I guess there are two situations, one where the impedance from the new component is off but at least is along the same reactance/resistance curve. The other of course is where the new impedance is also rotated.
I try to adjust the theoretical matching network to values that produce the same impedance as measured. And sometimes I feel good about the adjustment when, for example, I can be fairly certain its just stray capacitance. Other times I'm not so certain.
What is the best way to proceed in these situations?
Based on Dakota's comment below, let me clarify.
When putting together a matching network, my approach is to put together a design first using something like JJSmith. Then, starting with the first component at the antenna:
- Add the matching component, then measure with a VNA.
- If the measured impedance doesn't match the design, adjust the component values until I get the planned impedance at that point in the matching network.
- Go back to the Smith chart and adjust the component value (and Q if necessary) in the charting software until the software agrees with the actual reading. Doing so allows me to adjust the component values yet to be added so that once again I'm headed toward the target impedance. It also gives me an idea of the parasitic capacitance and impedance.
- Repeat 1-3 until the complete matching network is in, and at the target impedance.
- Connect to a sweep generator and see if the antenna and matching network is generally working as I expected. If not, because I kept the Smith chart "in sync" as I built the actual network, I at least have a few clues of which component to tweak if, for example, the circuit isn't resonating at exactly the right frequency.
My question: does anyone have a method that is more efficient. I really appreciate any comments.