I've used the footprint wizard to generate QFN package, the result:
My question is, if it's OK to remove the vias since I want to put some components to save same room?
Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for electronics and electrical engineering professionals, students, and enthusiasts. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this communityI've used the footprint wizard to generate QFN package, the result:
My question is, if it's OK to remove the vias since I want to put some components to save same room?
These vias serve two purposes:
In essence, if you're on a four (or more) layer board, and your IC doesn't seem to output a lot of heat, you'll probably be fine just putting vias from top layer to ground layer there, and not the whole way through (if your production technology allows for non-continuous vias).
If you're on a two-layer board, or need to get significant heat out of the chip: ditch the idea of removing these vias.
Completely getting rid of these vias will only be possible if you don't need the pad to attach to ground – which is an unlikely case, but I'm sure it's OK for some components. Things that deal with high frequencies (for example, touch sensors), or things that run at high processor clocks (for example, ARM CPUs), or things that require high-quality analog signaling (for example, ADCs) are surely not among the things I'd remove the ground vias from.
Also, almost all datasheet for QFN chips will come either with some section on recommended layout, or you'll find some application note explaining the same – refer to your IC's manufacturer's documentation on what you should do.
Another note: You seem to be designing a crazily high-density device if you're worried about the 4x4mm of a 0.5mm pitched QFN-16's reverse side... Maybe you should re-evaluate your component choices. There's microcontrollers that integrate the touch sensor, so you save that amount of space.