Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for electronics and electrical engineering professionals, students, and enthusiasts. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
I am working on an amplifier based on 555 triangle generator, a comparator and the IRAUDAMP1 as a guideline.
My problem is that i have high DC offset voltage at the output (-1.6V). What is the cause of this?
Is the problem right at the beggining, on the comparator circuit? Is the only way to fix this to use separate inductors for filtering for each mosfet?
LATER EDIT
The problem was the 555 generator. The exponential triangle causes DC offset problems.
You are trying to get zero out for zero in by dead-reckoning.
Any imbalance anywhere will give rise to a DC offset. Although all the components in the two sides are nominally the same, you cannot assume exact matching.
You use seperate comparators for the H and L FETs, which will have different offsets and speeds, level translators with different speeds, the high and low channel in the 2110 driver will be different, two physically different FETs, and a power supply that may or may not be balanced accurately. The elephant in the matching of course is the high/lowside driver, that uses a bootstrap high voltage supply, and two FETs of the same polarity to do a job that should (for balance) use opposite polarity FETS.
It is a wonder that you get as close to zero offset as you do.
Do not change the output topology to filter the FETs separately, keep the single inductor from the FET junction as you have it.
If you need a zero output offset, then it may be worth closing a low frequency filtered DC correction loop around the whole amplifier.
I would say the a better solution would be to use a single comparator and a mosfet driver that takes a single input. Like the Microchip MCP14628 or something similar that can handle +/- 30v (which is huge). Then you could use a simple zero balance pot to calibrate the circuit by setting the average DC level for the 555 (that might work with the existing circuit, too). Also, with that chip, you would not need Q1 or Q3 because the MCP14628 has TTL level inputs. Another advantage is the built in non-shoot thru control which can be very important at high power levels.
A simple back of the napkin calculation shows that for a 60v differential across 4 ohms yields 900 watts. What power output are you aiming for? If you're looking for that sort of output, I don't think a few volts at idle would matter too much to the speakers that could handle that.
