2
\$\begingroup\$

I got an old washing machine motor (universal) laying around that I'd like to speed control. I'm new to almost all the components mentioned above, but here is what I currently use:

  • Microcontroller: Arduino Nano
  • Optoisolator: MOC3041
  • TRIAC: 2N6071AB (Replace? Thinking of BTA24-600B)
  • Universal Motor: UOZ 112 G 55

After a long search I came across this circuit:

enter image description here

First off, I tried to hook the TRIAC (2N6073AB) to 240 VAC. It scattered into two pieces after about 5 sec. It says it's meant for 400 VAC, so I'm a bit confused. I didn't have a heat sink attached though, but still. Can someone explain this behaviour?

This is how I connected the TRAIC for testing purposes:

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

For the circuit above, I bought 1/4 watt resistors. I cannot understand how they can handle 240 VAC, seems really strange to me. Maybe they can't. Like the capacitor in series with the 39 ohm resistor. How is that even possible?

What role does the 330 ohm resistor play, why is this one needed? It also says "for highly inductive loads, change this value to 360 ohms." What value? Is it the 39 ohm resistor? Why change it, is it because of the high start current for motors?

For the 0.01 microfarad capacitor, where does this value come from? From what I've softly read, the snubber circuit is to prevent the phase shift between voltage and current caused by the motor, right? Will these capacitors do: blue ceramic disc capacitors 1KV 1000V 103PF 0.01uF?

I've been reading some PDFs about thyristors (including TRIACs,) and it said:

"The output of most microcomputer input/output (I/O) ports is a TTL signal capable of driving several TTL gates. This is insufficient to drive a zero-crossing TRIAC driver."

I guess that's not the case with Arduino Nano since it uses a PWM signal. Do I still need the NAND-gate? If someone would like to explain why the zero-crossing TRIAC driver doesn't accept certain signals, I would be grateful.

\$\endgroup\$
12
  • \$\begingroup\$ Pop the motor details into the question (rather than spread through the comments) so that all the relevant info is there. +1 for a very well written first question. \$\endgroup\$
    – Transistor
    Jul 31, 2016 at 18:49
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Controlling a Universal motor this way won't do quite what you expect. You'll need to separate its field and rotor windings, and keep the field winding connected to the full supply voltage (assuming it's shunt wound). Otherwise the speedup (from field reduction) and slowdown (from rotor voltage reduction) will cancel out. \$\endgroup\$
    – user16324
    Jul 31, 2016 at 18:58
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Brian Drummond Universal motors are series wound by definition. \$\endgroup\$
    – user80875
    Jul 31, 2016 at 19:06
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @CharlesCowie "if it were shunt wound, it wouldn't work at all with AC power" what stops it working with AC? Both rotor and field reverse polarity at the same time, just as in the series form. Is it the phase shift as the field winding is almost purely inductive? \$\endgroup\$
    – user16324
    Jul 31, 2016 at 21:28
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I believe the R/L would need to be much different because the armature and field would need to be designed to operate at the same voltage but draw much different currents. Also, the back emf controls the armature current. Those two things would cause a phase difference between the armature and field. With a series motor, there is only one current path and thus no possibility of phase difference. \$\endgroup\$
    – user80875
    Jul 31, 2016 at 22:03

1 Answer 1

3
\$\begingroup\$
  1. So first off; I've tried to hook the TRIAC (2N6073AB) to 240 VAC, it scattered into two pieces after about 5 sec.

Without a schematic of your wiring we can't say. It sounds as though you mis-wired it or switched it on to a dead-short between mains and neutral. There's a schematic button on the editor toolbar if you wish to update your question.

  1. For the circuit above, I bought 1/4 watt resistors, and I cannot understand how they can handle 240 VAC, seems really strange to me. Or maybe they can't? Like the capacitor in series with the 39 ohm resistor, how is that even possible?

enter image description here

Figure 1. Carbon film resistor with exposed carbon spiral (Tesla TR-212 1 kΩ). Source: Wikipedia Resistor.

There are three main specifications to watch when using resistors:

  • The resistance value. This is obvious.
  • The voltage rating. In Figure 1 we can see a spiral resistance track around a ceramic core. The track is probably about 20 to 25 mm long if unwound. Above a certain voltage electrical breakdown will occur across the resistor - perhaps jumping between turns on the spiral. Typically they're good to 200 to 250 V but mains voltage can peak at \$ \sqrt {2} V_{RMS}\$ so when we use them on 230 V mains we generally use two in series.
  • The power dissipation has to be kept below the rating of the resistor. This can be checked using \$ P = \frac {V^2}{R} \$ or \$ P = I^2R \$.

It may help to consider capacitors as two layers of foil separated by an insulating film. All that is required is to make the insulation layer thick enough to withstand the applied voltage.

  1. What role does the 330 ohm resistor play, why is this one needed? And it also says "for highly inductive loads, change this value to 360 ohms", what value? Is it the 39 ohm resistor? And why change it, is because of the high start current for motors?

There are three resistors in your circuit.

  1. For the 0.01 microFarrad capacitor, where does this value come from? And from what I've softly read, the snubber circuit is to prevent the phase shift between voltage and current caused by the motor, right? Will these capacitors do: Blue Ceramic Disc Capacitors 1KV 1000V 103PF 0.01uF?

Covered above. I don't know what the 103PF means. The Littlefuse article should give you enough detail on this.

  1. "The output of most microcomputer input/output (I/O) ports is a TTL signal capable of driving several TTL gates. This is insufficient to drive a zero-crossing TRIAC driver."

You don't quote a source for this but it looks a bit out of date. Most of the micros can now switch 20 mA and this is plenty for an opto-isolator LED.

  1. I guess that's not the case with Arduino Nano since it uses PWM signal? Or do I still need the NAND-gate? And if someone would like to explain why the zero-crossing TRIAC driver doesn't accept certain signals, I would be grateful.

PWM isn't used with triac control circuits. This is explained in my answer to Activating SSR for an AC motor via PWM input.

Further reading:

ON Semiconductor's 240 page Thyristor Theory and Design Considerations Handbook is a very in-depth look at the topic but is fairly readable if you pick an aspect of interest.

\$\endgroup\$
15
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thanks for your indepth answer. It was very helpful, but I haven't had time to take a closer look at it yet, but I sure will! "It sounds as though you mis-wired it or switched it on to a dead-short between mains and neutral." - Well, I was afraid of damaging the MOC3041 and the microcontroller, so I wanted to test the TRIAC first. But here is how I connected it: i.stack.imgur.com/UWvPV.png \$\endgroup\$ Jul 31, 2016 at 19:58
  • \$\begingroup\$ I also want to add that I am truely grateful for all your links as well, I'm most certanly gonna read them. As I found it rather difficult to find good reading materials myself. \$\endgroup\$ Jul 31, 2016 at 20:03
  • \$\begingroup\$ The connection looks OK but there's no trigger circuit shown. By the way, there's a schematic button on the editor toolbar and it embeds editable schematics into your post. \$\endgroup\$
    – Transistor
    Jul 31, 2016 at 20:07
  • \$\begingroup\$ "(...) but there's no trigger circuit shown", I didn't get that far with my experimenting, but I was going to use the circuit that I briefly mentioned in my topic: imgur.com/d9nEwLQ. Without the snubber circuit though, as I thought this wasn't as important. Let me know if I misunderstood you. \$\endgroup\$ Jul 31, 2016 at 20:23
  • \$\begingroup\$ OK. Double-check your triac pin-out. \$\endgroup\$
    – Transistor
    Jul 31, 2016 at 20:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.