0
\$\begingroup\$

So I was wondering if you have a system, consider it \$G(s)\$ and it has no initial energy i.e. \$x(0) = 0\$ for the initial condition. If the transfer function exhibits: pole cancellation, would it be considered stable. I know this is a common paradox in the discipline ,but with the knowledge of an already "energyless" system that will only respond to a simple input/output relationship. Does this actually affect the stability for controller purposes?

\$\endgroup\$
1
\$\begingroup\$

If \$G(s)\$ is an arbitrary transfer function it is BIBO stable if and only if it is linearly stable. The proof is simple. Let \$x(t)\$ be a bounded input and put \$x_0\$ as the least-upper-bound of \$x(t)\$. The Laplace transform gives

$$\frac{x_0}{s} > X(s)$$

hence

$$G(s)\frac{x_0}{s} > G(s)X(s)$$

hence

$$\mathscr{L}^{-1} \left\{G(s)\frac{x_0}{s} \right\} > \mathscr{L}^{-1}\{G(s)X(s)\}.$$

But since \$G(s)\$ is stable, \$\frac{G(s)}{s}\$ is also at least quasi-stable (has poles no further than the origin), so \$\mathscr{L}^{-1}\left\{G(s)\frac{x_0}{s} \right\}\$ is also bounded. Indeed \$\mathscr{L}^{-1} \{G(s)X(s)\} \$ will be a linear combination of terms within a collection of exponentially-decreasing envelopes, so the BIBO-linear stability correspondence is actually quite intuitive.

Pole cancellation can be done while maintaining stability, but it's risky because closed-loop poles move from their open-loop position and modeling / control uncertainties can cause the zeros to move off of the poles. If you use pole-zero cancellation to delete unstable poles the actual positions of the poles and zeros may not quite align, and the response will be unstable. SO NEVER DO THIS!!! The initial energy does not matter, as your inputs will excite modes corresponding to every pole which is not completely cancelled. The recommended approach for unstable poles, as always, is to use feedback to stabilize them.

| improve this answer | |
\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ also, if there is pole/zero cancellation of unstable poles and the system is not completely observable, then all sorts of unstable hell is happening to internal states of \$G(s)\$ while not observed in the output. not observed until those unstable internal states hit the power supply rails and the system goes non-linear, then you will see the trouble in the output. \$\endgroup\$ – robert bristow-johnson Apr 7 '17 at 8:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.