I was just trying to track down some noise in a gadget I built.

There's a DC signal that represents the level of ambient RF, and I am interested in very small changes in that level. These work out to changes of less than 100µVolts in the DC signal.

Right now I'm trying to be certain where the noise I see actually is coming from - whether it is in response to the ambient RF, or whether it (or some of it) is produced by my circuit.

Now for the actual question:

While making measurements, I switched from holding the probe to using a clip to hold the probe in place.

When I clipped the probe in place, the scope started showing a 50Hz hum at about 300µVolts peak to peak. What's more, the level is sensitive to where I stand. If I move closer the hum gets weaker. The further away I am, the stronger the hum.

I took the clip out and laid the probe in place to measure the signal I was looking at, and the hum went away. The signal was just like when I was holding the probe, with no hum (or at least so little hum that it got lost in the real noise I was trying to track.)

Why would using the clip cause the probe to become so sensitive to 50Hz hum?

I can obviously get around the problem just by carefully placing the probe or holding the probe while making measurements, but I can't undestand why the clip makes such a difference at such a low frequency. If this were RF then this kind of thing wouldn't surprise me, but why is the clip such a problem at 50Hz?

Here are some pictures of my setup:

No hum, probe carefully laid out to make contact with the point I'm trying to measure: enter image description here

That's about 150µVolts of noise, but the hum is lost in the noise.

Same setup, same point being measured, but using a clip:

enter image description here

That's about 300 to 400µVolts of hum. It gets worse when I get further away.

Probe and the clip that is causing me problems: enter image description here

That's Testec C3000 from Conrad. I know they are cheap, but I'm not using them on RF. Most of what I do is low frequency stuff (my scope is only good up to 15MHz, or less than 1MHz when using the 100µV per centimeter range.)

I measured the resistance from the clip to the bnc end of the probe. It is the same as from the probe tip to the bnc. Its about 400 Ohms.

I don't think it is a ground loop. I wouldn't expect a ground loop to care whether the probe is clipped into the circuit or just carefully balanced to make contact.

Another point against a ground loop is that I disconnected all power to the circuit (power supplies unplugged from board and outlet) and disconnected the antenna (well, LNB) from the board. The only ground connection was to the scope. The hum still shows up.

Based on the answer from Tony Stewart, I made a few experiments based just on length of the unshielded loop.

I found that a piece of wire the same length as the clip barrel causes about the same amount of hum to be measured. A much longer wire caused way lots more hum.

I wouldn't have thought it would be that noticeable at 50Hz, but it seems that a simple loop of wire can readily pick up 50Hz hum.

Experiments: Circuit powered off and all external connections removed. Only the scope probe and ground are connected. I changed the range to 500µVolts per centimeter.

No wire, just the probe:

enter image description here

Short wire and probe, wire about as long as the clip:

enter image description here

Long wire, about twice as long as the clip:

enter image description here

So, the hum is stronger with a longer loop.

I really didn't expect that much of difference at 50Hz.

It wasn't the clip, it was just the longer length of unshielded wire.

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Well, when you use an antenna, it picks up stuff around you... ;) \$\endgroup\$
    – PlasmaHH
    Oct 6, 2016 at 15:42
  • \$\begingroup\$ Hmm smells like a ground loop... there look to be plenty of potential ground connections in your circuit. With the power off see if you can measure the resistance between your 'scope probe ground and the circuit ground. As far as moving closer and farther away.. this does not fit with the ground loop idea.. and sounds like you are acting as an antenna/ shield... what happens if your ground yourself. \$\endgroup\$ Oct 6, 2016 at 15:43
  • \$\begingroup\$ I measured the resistance from the clip to the bnc end of the probe. It is the same as from the probe tip to the bnc. Its about 400 Ohms. \$\endgroup\$
    – JRE
    Oct 6, 2016 at 15:44
  • \$\begingroup\$ I would think a ground loop would cause the hum to be present whether I'm using the clip ot just balancing the probe on the point being measured. \$\endgroup\$
    – JRE
    Oct 6, 2016 at 15:45
  • \$\begingroup\$ @JRE I meant to measure resistance from 'scope ground clip. to the ground on your circuit... with the probe ground not attached. The loop would be through the ground clip of the 'scope... \$\endgroup\$ Oct 6, 2016 at 15:49

1 Answer 1


The ground wire on the probe with a 10M 10:1 probe still creates a loop antenna. To reduce the area of the loop, use two test pins <1cm apart and remove probe "antenna" ground wire and only use the tip and ground barrel for measurements.

If the noise still exists when you probe the ground, twist the scope cable to raise CM impedance and better, use a large ferrite choke around the probe cable. For even better results , calibrate two probes , twist both together, keep at right angles to stray current paths, remove ground and probe tips and calibrated to match perfectly ona scope test square wave then use Ch2 Invert and add Ch1&2 to get a perfect flat line, then verify probing ground near noisy source with barrel grounded to same ground pin and use large ferrite torroid or clamshell choke around both cables

This is the best you can do without more expensive active diff probes.

when using Ch 1 Invert, ensure both channels have calibrated gain in desired gain range and do not saturate either channel when using a Differential Probe method of scoping, other difference errors result.

  • when you have imbalanced probe high Z , within high voltage E fields, your body can and does absorb stray E field (high V but low power) and shunt to ground,, thus you can improve apparent readings.
  • \$\begingroup\$ I am using the ground wire clipped to ground in both cases. The only difference is in whether the probe tip is carefully balanced to make contact, or whether I use a clip on the probe tip to hold it in place. Can the \$\endgroup\$
    – JRE
    Oct 6, 2016 at 15:59
  • \$\begingroup\$ ok but my methods work best, no ground clip wire, only contact to probe ring ground to a test gnd pin near signal. naturally missing probe ground connection at signal will create a large loop antenna. \$\endgroup\$ Oct 6, 2016 at 16:04
  • \$\begingroup\$ I can work using a short ground wire and the probe tip. Would have to hold it in place. Thing is, that delivers the same results as using the ground wire and holding the probe. \$\endgroup\$
    – JRE
    Oct 6, 2016 at 16:11
  • \$\begingroup\$ My scope is so ancient it doesn't do invert and sum. It has two completely separate traces (two guns in one tube) driven by the same timebase and two separate horizontal amplifiers. \$\endgroup\$
    – JRE
    Oct 6, 2016 at 16:12
  • \$\begingroup\$ then add gnd test pin near signal, remove gnd clip and twist probe cable and add ferrite to cable to isolate it better. Also improving ground of signal with braided wire helps and shielded or twisted pair signal path helps. \$\endgroup\$ Oct 6, 2016 at 16:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.