4
\$\begingroup\$

I find a lot of online tools to calculate the capacitance between two traces (or a trace and a plane) on opposite pcb layers. One such tool can be found here: http://chemandy.com/calculators/rectangular-capacitor-calculator.htm

enter image description here

However, I would like to calculate the capacitance between adjacent traces on the pcb. Something like this:

enter image description here

Has anyone an idea how to do this?

EDIT :
Imagine the following example:

  • Two tracks run parallel for 10 mm.
  • Each track is 0.2 mm wide.
  • The distance between both tracks is also 0.2 mm.
  • Copper thickness is about 20 µm.
  • Board thickness is 1.6 mm.
  • PCB material is standard FR4.
  • One track is signal, the other Gnd.
  • There are no other tracks in the area, nor any (Gnd-) planes.
\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ What is your end goal? Transmission line effects are usually the biggest concern over capacitance. \$\endgroup\$
    – Voltage Spike
    Commented Oct 18, 2016 at 17:03
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ The signal freq is rather low (250 kHz). The signal is in fact a pin from a capacitive sensor. So routing it parallel to a Gnd trace will cause some "capacitive offset". I'm trying to estimate that. \$\endgroup\$
    – K.Mulier
    Commented Oct 18, 2016 at 17:14

2 Answers 2

2
\$\begingroup\$
  • This is determined by copper thickness, gap, dielectric constant, d and length and thus there is incremental C and L with resulting impedance , Zo for a coplanar microstrip and thus C can be computed from this. For Zo=50R it is about 3.3pF /" or 1.3pF/cm

  • So compute Zo from a coplanar stripline calculator (complex) then compute C from Zo as shown here. This assumes other conductors are >10x further away. If not then you have a mesh of calculations ;)

  • If you can't find a coplanar stripline tool, try this formula.

\$ C [pf/cm] = 0.12 * \dfrac{t}{w} + 0.09 * (1+d)*log_{10}(1 + \dfrac{2w}{g} + \dfrac{w}{g}^2)\$

  • w = width of track [mm]
  • t = thickness of track [um]
  • d = dielectric constant ~ 4.2 FR4
  • g = gap [mm]

hopefully, I got the units correct...you do the math on a 50R pair.

The second term dominates. Using k=3.5 (kapton), w=10 mm, s = 0.5 mm, t = 2 microns, the capacitance is 1.1 pf/cm

Reference https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/capacitance-of-coplaner-adjacent-plates.130876/

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ let's say I have two traces. One is a signal, the other is Gnd. They run parallel to each other for 1 cm. The copper thickness is 20 µm, the distance between the tracks is 0.2 mm. The tracks are also 0.2 mm wide.. \$\endgroup\$
    – K.Mulier
    Commented Oct 18, 2016 at 15:56
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ If the result is in pf/cm, how can there be l (length of paired tracks) in the equation. pf/cm suggests that the result is length independent but the equation itself required length, any thoughts on this? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 6, 2019 at 5:13
  • \$\begingroup\$ I checked my ref and the next post corrected it by comment \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 6, 2019 at 9:47
1
\$\begingroup\$

I use ATLC for this. You can also draw your own setup (with the correct colours) and have it solve that. http://atlc.sourceforge.net/

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Thank you Matthew. This tool looks very promising indeed. Unfortunately, it seems a bit tough to get started with. I don't have the time to dig deeper into it. Do you know a good formula? \$\endgroup\$
    – K.Mulier
    Commented Oct 19, 2016 at 12:43
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @K.Mulier I can't provide a formula, but I did use the tools to solve your problem - 63pF/m. If you are on Windows try this hdtvprimer.com/kq6qv/atlc2.html \$\endgroup\$
    – Matthew
    Commented Oct 19, 2016 at 14:51
  • \$\begingroup\$ Hi @Matthew, I've been trying to use ATLC2 to emulate your results and I'm getting values above 400pF. Is the value that ATLC converges on actually in pF/m? in the "results" panel, it only says pF... \$\endgroup\$
    – Sean Dever
    Commented Mar 10, 2020 at 22:51

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.