1. With regard to DFM, I am wondering if there is no risk of solder bridge during reflow as long as there is a soldermask web between the pads?

  2. Soldermask clearance(2 mils*2) + soldermask web(4 mils) = 8 mils Is it 8mil the minimum pad-to-pad spacing to avoid solder bridges? If so, how about soldermask-defined pad, still 8 mils?



2 Answers 2


This depends entirely on the board fab and the assembler. 0.5mm pitch components are common (MSOP-10 et al). Depending on the manufacturer they may recommend as big as 0.4mm pads, meaning you have only 0.1mm gap between the pads! I would personally ignore such advice as 100µm enters the realm of "special" board fabbing technologies. If you make the pads 0.3 or 0.35mm, you will have comfortable 150-200µm gap between the pads. Never make pads smaller than the physical pins unless absolutely necessary and never make paste mask opening bigger than the pad size.

If you have something actually fine pitch such as the 0.4mm component mentioned here it gets more and more painful. It's very important to talk with the assembler to establish if they can work with the specification and what recommendations they would have re: solder mask and paste mask.

On fine-pitch BGAs (0.5mm is very very fine pitch here) it's even more important to establish a rapport with the assembler. Often the chip manufacturer is unhelpful on this as they'd have to take responsibility if they give out design parameters. BGA pads are NOT that straightforward as the paste dot size and solder mask opening size versus the pad size really does matter.

Some things to consider here are copper thicknesses, stencil manufacturing process and thicknesses, paste mask shrink if any etc etc. Theoretically the PCB fab guys should "know better" and adjust your paste mask/solder mask gerbers but that's a gamble. On the other hand, if you tell them not to adjust the gerbers you better be damn sure you have the parameters correct.


I don't know what the minimum is, but I recently worked on a design with 0.4mm pitch pads. The pads were 0.23mm. So the pad edge to pad edge dimension is only 0.17mm, which is around 6 or 7 mils.

You might be confused in your terminology. In a solder-mask-defined pad, the copper pad is larger than the opening in the solder mask. So the solder mask defines the pad. This is the conventional case.

A non solder-mask defined pad has no solder mask web between pads. It is defined only by the copper. This is done for fine-pitch parts (such as my 0.4mm pitch part) because the solder mask would be so thin that it is beyond the printing capabilities of the PCB fabrication house.

As long as the paste is controlled carefully, the risk of shorts is kept low, even with no mask between pads.

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ And even with solder mask there is no guarantee you won't get bridges if the paste is not controlled carefully. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Oct 19, 2016 at 12:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.