0
\$\begingroup\$

I am new to FPGA and I am trying to send a CLOCK signal as an output of a GPIO pin of an Altera Cyclone IV E. I first made a program:

module CLOCK_out (input CLOCK_50, output CLOCK_pin);
      assign CLOCK_pin = CLOCK_50;

endmodule

It just sends out the default 50 MHz clock signal of the DE0-Nano Board to a GPIO pin. This is a success. However, when I viewed the signal with an oscilloscope, what I have is a 50MHz sine wave (see attached picture). I feel like I produced the wrong signal because I am expecting a square wave instead . I don't know where I am wrong. I am using 3.3V LVTTL standard for the IO. Is there something wrong with what I have done or is the output really a sine wave after all?

I need help. Thanks in Advance

enter image description here

\$\endgroup\$

1 Answer 1

1
\$\begingroup\$

What's the bandwidth on your scope? If it's not significantly greater than 50 MHz (say, 500 MHz or more), the scope's bandwidth limit will turn your square wave into a sine wave. This is because a square wave consists of a series of odd frequency harmonics...in this case 50 Mhz, 150 Mhz, 250 MHz, etc. So if you have, say, a 100 MHz scope, you will miss all of the frequency components except the fundamental at 50 MHz, and you'll get a very nice sine wave even though you actually have a square wave with very sharp edges and lots of high frequency harmonics. If you use a 500 MHz scope, then you'll get 50, 150, 250, 350, and 450 MHz which will result in a nice square wave. And using mile long jumper wires like that will certainly not help with signal integrity.

\$\endgroup\$
4
  • \$\begingroup\$ Hi Alex, So I just have to increase the bandwidth of the oscilloscope to a value much greater than 50 MHz then that will solve my problem and produce the square wave I am expecting? \$\endgroup\$
    – Adaptive
    Commented Oct 24, 2016 at 3:57
  • \$\begingroup\$ Yes, it's just that getting a scope with more bandwidth could be a bit expensive. Looks like it's working correctly, the sine wave is just an artifact of the limited scope bandwidth. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Oct 24, 2016 at 3:59
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thanks Sir. I will try to explore the oscilloscope if its bandwidth may be adjusted. Thanks for your help :) \$\endgroup\$
    – Adaptive
    Commented Oct 24, 2016 at 4:27
  • \$\begingroup\$ You will most likely have to buy, borrow, or otherwise procure a higher-end scope. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Oct 24, 2016 at 4:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.