In my current lecture about Analog IC Design the prof mentioned on the side that the output resistance of the following voltage divider is \$ \frac{R}{2} \$. Can someone explain me why that is the case?


simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

  • \$\begingroup\$ Calculate the Thevenin equivalent resistance of your circuit. That is the output resistance. \$\endgroup\$
    – Barry
    Commented Oct 26, 2016 at 20:46

2 Answers 2


The idea of output resistance comes from a thought where you place the circuit you have into a black box where you cannot see it and don't know what it is, anymore. You have access to two terminals from this box. You can measure the voltage with a voltmeter and that tells you something. You can then short out the terminals using an ammeter and see what current you measure (hopefully, this doesn't damage whatever is in the black box or you when trying to do this step.) You can then mentally propose that the circuit in the black box is the equivalent of this:


simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

Since using a perfect voltmeter means that there isn't any current used during the measurement, the voltage you measured across A to B with the voltmeter tells you the voltage of this hidden equivalent voltage source. (The resistor doesn't drop a voltage without current flowing through it, so the measurement accurately reflects that hidden source.) Now, when you short A to B using an ammeter and measure the current, you can work out the effective resistance of R. It's just:


That has to be the case, right?

That value you computed is the effective "output resistance" of this black box.

Now, let's return to your circuit and try to figure out what a black box measuring process would give us. Let's call the top resistor \$R_1\$ instead of just R and the bottom resistor \$R_2\$ also instead of just R. That way we can work this out, more generally.

If you just put a voltmeter up to \$V_{mid}\$ and ground, you'd measure a voltage:

$$V_{voltmeter} = V_{dd}\cdot\frac{R_2}{R_1+R_2}$$

And if you hooked up an ammeter up to \$V_{mid}\$ and ground, you'd measure a current:

$$I_{ammeter} = \frac{V_{dd}}{R_1}$$

Now, if you divide these, you get the following resistance:

$$R=\frac{V_{dd}\cdot\frac{R_2}{R_1+R_2}}{\frac{V_{dd}}{R_1}}=\frac{R_1 R_2}{R_1+R_2}$$

But that's just the parallel equivalent of the two resistors! In your case, where the values are both the same, this just means half the value (like your teacher said.)

So you can compute this black box resistor's equivalent value and, in fact, the circuit will behave as if that resistor value really were present. It's not, because you can see the actual circuit. But if you couldn't see the hidden circuit, you'd have to postulate this resistance being there.

There's a deeper, and for some more satisfying, approach using differential equations. But I'll avoid going there.


The output voltage is obviously 0.5V. Suppose we put a 1K load to ground on the circuit. The output voltage will then be ~0.47619 volts using the voltage divider equation (and the output current is ~0.476190mA). So the output resistance is dropping 23.8mV, and the output resistance can be calculated to be 50.0\$\Omega\$.

To see this intuitively, look 'into' the Vmid junction. You see 100\$\Omega\$ to ground and 100\$\Omega\$ to an ideal voltage source. So any current that goes into or out of that junction has 100\$\Omega\$ || 100\$\Omega\$ to voltages that won't change no matter the current.

Note that if the voltage source is not ideal, and has some internal resistance, the output resistance will be higher.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.