In many Power over Ethernet (POE) setups the transmission voltage is 48V or slightly more. While higher voltage has obvious efficiency advantages, how safe it is? Is there any risk of electrocution when accidentally exposed, in particular to children? Such wirings lack the protection that is used for 120/230V, and frankly the difference between 48V and 120V doesn't seem to be that significant.

  • 5
    \$\begingroup\$ What's a POE, and why would it be exposing itself to children? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Nov 6, 2016 at 7:54
  • 14
    \$\begingroup\$ @BruceAbbott Power over Ethernet. I'm concerned about accidental exposure. not anything on purpose. The Ethernet cables aren't perceived as dangerous by people and lack the protection 120V/230V cables and systems have. \$\endgroup\$
    – Petr
    Commented Nov 6, 2016 at 7:58
  • 19
    \$\begingroup\$ The original POTS (Plain old telephone) was a 48V system and that lasted for almost 100 years. \$\endgroup\$
    – crowie
    Commented Nov 6, 2016 at 7:59
  • 17
    \$\begingroup\$ @crowie. The ringing voltage of the POTS were higher and could give you a nice shock. \$\endgroup\$
    – Decapod
    Commented Nov 6, 2016 at 10:05
  • 24
    \$\begingroup\$ How many Watts do you expect your kids to negotiate over IEEE 802.3? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Nov 7, 2016 at 15:15

9 Answers 9


frankly the difference between 48V and 120V doesn't seem to be that significant.

120V is 2.4 times higher than 48V - hardly what I would call 'not that significant'. 120VAC is even worse, for two reasons:-

  1. 120VAC has a peak voltage of 170V, 3.5 times higher than 48VDC.

  2. The 'electric shock' feeling occurs on every peak of the AC waveform, whereas with DC it mostly occurs on initial contact.

It only takes about 30mA of 60Hz AC current through the heart to cause fibrillation, compared to 300-500mA of DC current. The 'let go' current (above which you cannot let go of a grasped conductor) is 4 times higher for DC than AC. So that means you need 4-17 times more DC voltage to get a fatal shock.

Combine 2.4 times higher voltage with 4-17 times higher susceptibility, and 120VAC is approximately 10-40 times more deadly than 48VDC.

But is 48VDC safe in an Ethernet cable? Provided you don't strip off the insulation and poke the bare wires into your flesh, the chances of getting a fatal electric shock from it are negligible. I know from personal experience because I was a telephone exchange technician for 15 years, and regularly worked on live equipment with exposed contacts. The biggest DC shock I ever got was a light tingle when grasping a 50V bus bar (90VAC ringing was a different story...).

  • 16
    \$\begingroup\$ Then there is this old story. Unclear whether it is fictitious, but it could be true: freedomisknowledge.com/otw/stuff/pissingandmoaning.html \$\endgroup\$ Commented Nov 6, 2016 at 9:14
  • 21
    \$\begingroup\$ I can remember when I was quite a bit younger, handling stripped phone wiring in preparation to connecting them to screwdown terminals. The 48 volts DC on-hook I didn't feel in the least. However, when the phone rung, the 90 volts AC ringing voltage gave me quite a shock. \$\endgroup\$
    – DoxyLover
    Commented Nov 6, 2016 at 10:09
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ @RichardCrowley heartfelt thanks for that. I cried. :-) (and then the telephone rang) \$\endgroup\$ Commented Nov 6, 2016 at 23:00
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Apart from dismantling, stripping and poking a wire in bare flesh, a child can simply put an ethernet cable end directly in his/her mouth. The difference between POE and POTS and regular electricity cables is that the POTS and regular electricity cables have plugs that cover most of the conducting metals. POE with RJ45 not much so. \$\endgroup\$
    – nl-x
    Commented Nov 8, 2016 at 14:49
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @nl-x most popular phone plug is RJ11, same style as as RJ45. Simple fix for both cases is to break the tab off the plug so babies can't unplug the cord. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Nov 8, 2016 at 17:40

48V is the practical and LEGAL definition of the maximum voltage to be considered "low voltage" and intrinsically "safe". Certainly 48V delivered UNDER your relatively insulating skin surface could kill you if delivered in the "right" place. But we are assuming people aren't walking around with subcutaneous electrodes exposed to accidental contact with "LV" wiring. 48V is reasonably safe for most people under normal conditions.

As observed by @crowie, the original (and current) technology wired public telephone system operates on 48V for over 100 years. That old telephone technology is very likely the precedent for establishing 48V as the legal limit.

  • 20
    \$\begingroup\$ Just to be pedantic, here in the UK at least, Low Voltage is anything under 1000V. Hence for instance 960V battery sets called Low Voltage, ouch. Under 50V is "Extra Low Voltage", and if it is not ground referenced and double insulated and various other specifications, it's "Safety Extra Low Voltage", precisely because you can't get a shock by touching one of the wires. \$\endgroup\$
    – Ian Bland
    Commented Nov 6, 2016 at 10:41
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ @IanBland: not correct - there are very different definitions used in electrical power transmission/distribution, vs electrical safety codes. You wouldn't transmit power at 1000V into a residential house. \$\endgroup\$
    – smci
    Commented Nov 6, 2016 at 12:38
  • 6
    \$\begingroup\$ @smci There isn't 1kV transmission, period. It goes from 230/415 up to 3.3kV, then 11kV on the UK distribution system. But terminologically, a local battery set or generator working below 1000V would be termed as low voltage. Above that, anyone working on it would have to be HV qualified. It's a pretty good breakpoint because it's above that kind of voltage that you need a specialised working and safety skill set. \$\endgroup\$
    – Ian Bland
    Commented Nov 6, 2016 at 13:58
  • 18
    \$\begingroup\$ @IanBland In microelectronics we call anything above the power rail "High Voltage". Even 5 V can be high voltage. Just a matter of context... \$\endgroup\$
    – bogl
    Commented Nov 6, 2016 at 16:11
  • 7
    \$\begingroup\$ IanBland is using the definition laid down by the International Electrotechnical Commission, which seems fair to me. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extra-low_voltage \$\endgroup\$
    – nekomatic
    Commented Nov 7, 2016 at 11:17

No death by electrocution going to happen

48V is considered "safe", and that is for good reason.

First, the impedance of the human body at 50V is around 45kΩ (though measured on adults). While children are overall smaller and thus should have slightly lower impedance, it's the skin resistance which makes up 95% of that impedance (internal body fluids are pretty good conductors), so the size doesn't matter all that much.

(Note how body impedance is a funny thing, it goes down rapidly as voltage goes up, at 240V it's 10-15 times lower!)

Further, an electric current needs somewhere to go, obviously. No closed circuit, no current. That's why birds sitting on an overland line aren't fried.

These 48V are 48V against ground. In all likelihood, the next closest thing to "ground" that you have contact with is "parquet/laminate" or "floor tiles" or something similar, in other words, resistance around infinite, current zero.
Even touching the hot wire on 240V has a good chance of "not much bad stuff happening", if you wear shoes and aren't precisely standing in a puddle of water (although for obvious reasons I wouldn't advise trying your luck!).

Let's assume the absolutely worst case: a child puts one finger onto the ground pin on a wall plug, and sucks on the PoE cable (looks edible, doesn't it!). Against all odds, the PSE is broken or heftily non-compliant and instead of supplying 10.2V/4mA max as per default, it supplies full operational voltage, and unlimited current. Or, it takes some random pattern that the child accidentially made for a valid negotiation, whatever.
Also, for an unexplainable reason, the current doesn't short circuit over the data wires (the likely thing to happen would be exactly that, a little spark on the child's tongue, and the child dropping the cable in a fright).
Let's just say there's actually 40V on the wire, and the current "decides" to go through the child's body, against all reason and against the laws of physics.

Cable-in-mouth will eliminate one skin barrier and thus approximately halve the body impedance. That's 22.5kΩ remaining. Let's round down to 20kΩ to be sure. No, you know what, let's be outrageous, and say 10kΩ. 48V/10kΩ = 4.8mA.
Which... is harmless even for alternating current. It takes about 8-10 times as much alternating current (of a frequency in the critical 50-60Hz range) to stop the heart.

Now, on top of that, PoE doesn't have alternating current, it's DC. So the scary bit about cardiac arrest doesn't even apply.

Of course, DC can in principle cause adverse effects other than stopping the heart (think of a surgical electro knife, or the "electric chair"), but given voltages in the two digit range and currents in the single-digit milliampere range, this simply isn't going to happen (but even if it was, it would primarily be local burns, not life threatening).

  • 7
    \$\begingroup\$ 48V DC melts-in-your-mouth goodness will probably make a child, you, or most people have enough of an involuntary and violent reaction to facilitate a secondary accident (eg falling off a ladder).... \$\endgroup\$ Commented Nov 7, 2016 at 8:47
  • 25
    \$\begingroup\$ Note that PoE requires negotiation before 48V is applied. Your laptop won't fry if you connect it to a PoE port, and your average child is also fairly unlikely to successfully finish a POE power negotiation. \$\endgroup\$
    – MSalters
    Commented Nov 7, 2016 at 13:17
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ @MSalters: Certain vendors do use 24V nonstandard "passive PoE", which requires no negotiation – but based on these posts I'm going to guess that's fairly safe? \$\endgroup\$
    – user1686
    Commented Nov 7, 2016 at 14:35
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ Hmm... Remember that 9V block on your tongue? Did you try 12V? It's quite a bite. That times four... ouch. It may not be absolutely lethal, but I imagine it could cause serious injury, maybe death through asphyxiation from spasms of your trachea. 48V in the mouth is probably just not safe. \$\endgroup\$
    – JimmyB
    Commented Nov 7, 2016 at 16:58
  • 11
    \$\begingroup\$ The kind of argument as presented in the answer is somewhere between useless and harmful, in my opinion. Yes, it is true that most times nothing will happen. Yes, it is true that directly touching 240V can have no effect whatsoever. But this is beside the point. The question with electricity (and gas, and water under pressure, and CO producing reactions, and ...) is not whether everything can go well, but whether anything can go wrong. At the end of the day, if your child is dead, disfigured or braindamaged, you do not care that there was only an outrageous 1% chance of that happening. \$\endgroup\$
    – AnoE
    Commented Nov 7, 2016 at 17:01

Different areas of the world differ slightly, but the 'safe' level for low voltage tends to be pitched at the 40 to 60v range, below which it is deemed that the likelyhood of electrocution is negligible. 'High voltage' cars use 42v, 3 '12v' batteries in series.

120v is sufficiently hazardous that plenty of people die of 120v mains shocks. Apparently more Americans die of 120v than Europeans die of 240v, perhaps due to a sense of complacency over the lower voltage (somebody check on snopes and debunk if necessary!)

  • 9
    \$\begingroup\$ The UK has extremely robust and well designed mains connectors, the 13A BS1363 fused plug and socket arrangement which domestic users mostly encounter is a design masterpiece. \$\endgroup\$
    – Ian Bland
    Commented Nov 6, 2016 at 10:43
  • 7
    \$\begingroup\$ @IanBland I'm glad you got that off your chest Ian, it was obviously a feeling in urgent need of expression, whether relevant to the Q/A or not. \$\endgroup\$
    – Neil_UK
    Commented Nov 6, 2016 at 12:19
  • 17
    \$\begingroup\$ @IanBland: Most of Europe doesn't use the super-robust UK plugs, though. Still, having personally witnessed US power plugs hanging halfway out of the socket, with nearly a finger's width of exposed live metal, I can definitely say that even the crappiest Euro plug I've seen has been better than that. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Nov 6, 2016 at 13:08
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ The other point being that RJ45s aren't designed to produce any kind of safety isolation. The original question refers to children who tend to have a rather low impedance. I do know that when I was 7 years or so old, I could get quite a "tingle" off my 12VDC model railway tracks which was not dangerous (presumably) but I did find distressing. I wouldn't personally connect a child to 48V. \$\endgroup\$
    – Ian Bland
    Commented Nov 6, 2016 at 14:08
  • 5
    \$\begingroup\$ @IanBland: The RJ-45 end is entirely safe. If it's exposed, there's no 48V applied from the other end. POE requires negotiation before full power is made available. I'm not sure whether you get 5V or 12V to handle the negotiation. \$\endgroup\$
    – MSalters
    Commented Nov 7, 2016 at 13:21

First off, some people seem to have fixated on POTS which is nothing like PoE. Props to all the telecom engineers who've had ringing current up the arm on a sweaty day running jumpers.

Further to the good answers above about the safety of 48vDC in itself, PoE is a negotiated protocol - the connected devices start from the fail-safe assumption that the other device is NOT PoE compatible and therefore would not enjoy having power shoved up its interface. Only when two PoE-compatible devices are connected does one see the special signalling that tells it it might want to offer PoE - from there, the two devices will negotiate on what one needs / what the other can deliver and will effectively "work up" towards the required power level. It's also worth noting the power they arrive at could be much lower than the full amount supported - very few devices are that power hungry.

A disconnected or dangling cable (one end plugged into a PoE port) will NOT have an appreciable voltage on it - in fact no more than a standard ethernet cable.

In short, unless your kid manages to chew through a connected & working PoE cable AND bridge the conductors but miraculously WITHOUT causing the devices to spot the fault / lose connection, it's unlikely you could even get to the delicious volts inside before it's all shut down.

WARNING: This assumes real standards-compliant PoE devices rather than the many proprietary ways companies find of getting power up an ethernet cable, which often consists of a wall-wart wired to the spare wires in an ethernet adapter. In that case, you are at the mercy of the power supply - it could be some small anemic low-voltage wall-wart that's no issue at all or it could be a relatively high-current 48v or higher unit which MIGHT be a bit more risky, but frankly unless you've bought some ridiculous non-standards compliant not-really-PoE ethernet-connected floodlight or something you're at low risk.

One example I've seen of relatively high-power PoE-ish devices are high-end CCTV cameras with high-power LED's and full PTZ movement, they can draw 100-200W, but in the home it'd be very unlikely you'd ever find something like that.

Well, you might in my home, but, y'know...

Most other not-quite-PoE devices I've seen are just squirting 12-24v up the spare pairs from a <50w power brick or wall wart.

  • \$\begingroup\$ The negotiation part is interesting, I didn't know about it. Could you please elaborate on how the negotiation happens? Thank you. \$\endgroup\$
    – Petr
    Commented Nov 9, 2016 at 6:15
  • \$\begingroup\$ I can't elaborate as I haven't read the standards document (and, as ever, there's other competing standards in the market) but the principle is basically the same all round - as you're adding power to a connector that, by default, is only used for data you can't just assume the other end will be OK with it, you have to detect & negotiate. \$\endgroup\$
    – John U
    Commented Nov 9, 2016 at 14:12

In Europe, the maximum voltage for child toys is 24 V DC only. If applied directly over the heart at chest and back, even smaller voltages may be dangerous.


IEC 62368-1:2014 defines "safe" as 60VDC or 2mA DC, whichever is less. For AC the limits are 30VAC and 0.5mA. These are considered safe for an ordinary person but you still cannot leave exposed connectors/wires lying around as there's the whole chapter of "electrical fires" to consider.

There are higher limits for an "instructed person" e.g. service techies. These are 120VDC and 50VAC, with a special exception given for 90VAC telephone network ringing. These are defined as being noticeable or even unpleasant but usually would not produce harmful electrical physiological effects.. Current limits are 25mA DC and 5mA AC.

Anything above that is considered dangerous with "normal" frequencies, SMPS circuits might exceed the 100kHz AC limit but that's beyond the scope here.


A couple of other answers mention 48V DC being a "safe" voltage, however I would argue that the environmental conditions (grounding, skin conductance etc) are far more important factors than just voltage.

The following is anecdotal admittedly, but I have experienced a very nasty DC shock working on a 48V DC gyro on a ship after coming inside with wet salty hands.

See also the following stackexchange answer that claims even 24V can be dangerous under certain conditions. How much voltage is "dangerous"?


What is more important than voltage in electrical safety is current. The amount of current required to start or stop the heart is 60 mA across the chest. Under the right circumstances even 12 volts can be lethal. In a marine environment- i.e capsized boat in salt water any person in the current path could be killed. 48 Volts could give you a healthy jolt if your skin is moist with sweat. Under normal circumstances with dry skin 48 Volts would probably wake you up but not kill you. When the the electrical current is strong enough to burn away the layer of skin and fat and comes in contact with the tissue directly below this layer it is extremely conductive then even relative low voltages can be lethal.

AC is far more deadly than DC- One of the reasons it is the preferred for performing an execution in the old days.

  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ "The amount of current required to start or stop the heart is 60 mA across the chest." No, at 60 mA stopping the heart is almost guaranteed. Lower values, like 20 mA can still be enough to irregulate your heartbeat enough to crash it. \$\endgroup\$
    – Mast
    Commented Nov 7, 2016 at 11:15
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ The reason for the preferration of AC for executions in the old days was the bad campaign of Edison against the AC current of Tesla and Westinghouse. Edison wanted to change the public opinion, AC current should appear to be more dangerous than Edisons DC current. Generation of high voltages was much easier with AC than DC in those days. \$\endgroup\$
    – Uwe
    Commented Nov 7, 2016 at 12:45
  • \$\begingroup\$ @uwe: That was one of the reasons as well. However that doesn't change the fact the AC is far more lethal because of frying of neural synapses which are designed to conduct in one direction at a time as opposed to 60 times a second both ways. \$\endgroup\$
    – Old_Fossil
    Commented Nov 7, 2016 at 14:51
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Speaking as someone who's dealt a lot with electric shock risk, DC is always the scary one. AC tends to cause a spasm that throws you off the conductor, DC can clamp you onto it. It will lock the muscles rigid, whereas they still have some leeway to move with AC. And if there's enough current to fry anything, you're probably dead, frankly. A survivable shock just interrupts the functioning of the nervous system. It's the difference between a circuit needing a restart/boot, and the magic smoke escaping from components. Also, Uwe is right about Edison. It's a grisly tale. \$\endgroup\$
    – Ian Bland
    Commented Nov 7, 2016 at 20:44

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.