I am working on the controller for a product that incorporates a humidity controlled chamber, such chamber is (generally) kept at rh80-95% but, even in normal usage, it is possible and acceptable that the humidity reaches 100% and condensing.

Honeywell HIH sensors, http://sensing.honeywell.com/index.php?ci_id=147072 , look great for the task, however they make a dinstinction between sensor that are suited for up to rh100% and those who are suited for rh100% and condensing.

Seems that the only difference between the two versions is the presence of a little "net" in front of the sensor orifice. Can I just use (for economical reasons outside the purpose of this question) the "non-condensing" version and protect it with a fine mesh in front of the orifice or the under-the-hood difference between the two is bigger that the physical protection of the sensor??


  • \$\begingroup\$ Are they really so much cheaper that it pays out to make the filter yourself? \$\endgroup\$ – PlasmaHH Nov 11 '16 at 9:54
  • \$\begingroup\$ Definitely yes. \$\endgroup\$ – Caterpillaraoz Nov 11 '16 at 9:59
  • \$\begingroup\$ It might be possible that the sensor suited for no condensation will get problems with stability and reliability when used with condensation. You will not be sure that your protection with a fine mesh will prevent those problems for the next years. What if the product frequently fails after some time because the wrong sensor was used? \$\endgroup\$ – Uwe Nov 11 '16 at 16:18
  • \$\begingroup\$ Unless we`ll know factually that the only difference is the mesh we will go for the more expensive protected sensor \$\endgroup\$ – Caterpillaraoz Nov 14 '16 at 8:00

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.