2
\$\begingroup\$

As we know the power equations are P=VI, P=V2/R or P=I2*R.

My question is: how I can increase the power by increasing and decreasing the resistance?

In the formula P=V2/R, if I want to increase the power I have to reduce the resistance value as much as I can, but if I decrease the R in the other formula P=I^2*R the power will decrease.

If we have R= small value in first formula, the power will increase regardless of voltage and the amount of R. In the second formula the power will decrease regardless of current, how?

I hope my question is clear:)

\$\endgroup\$
4
\$\begingroup\$

You have discovered the issue of impedance matching.

As you noted, the power dissipated by a resistance is:

  P = V2 / R

but is also:

  P = I2 R

The first says to get more power you decrease R, but the second says you need to increase it.

These are not really conflicting if you look closer. The first equation says that lower resistance draws more power from a constant voltage source. The second equation says that higher resistance draws more power from a constant current source. Both statements are correct.

OK, but does more or less resistance draw more power from some arbitrary source? That depends on whether the source is more current-like or more voltage-like relative to the existing resistance. We can describe this current-like or voltage-like characteristic with the impedance of the source. Ideal voltage sources have 0 impedance. No matter what current you draw, the voltage stays the same. Likewise, ideal current sources have infinite impedance. No matter their output voltage, the current stays the same.

Now imagine a source with some finite resistance. You can think of it as either a Thevenin or Norton source. Both are equivalent, and will yield the same result. If you put a 0 Ω load across it, you will get maximum current but no voltage. Power is voltage times current, so the power is zero. The power is likewise zero with infinite resistance, since the current is zero.

The power is zero at each extreme of load resistance. It happens that the power is maximum when the load resistance matches the power supply's resistance. Put another way, that's the point where the supply switches between looking more current-like to more voltage-like, for the load resistance presented to it.

For example, consider a 10 V source with 2 Ω in series (or equivalently, a 5 A source with 2 Ω across it). Look at a few different load resistances, calculate the voltage or current, and from that the power. You will find that 2 Ω draws the most power. Both a little more and a little less draws less power.

For extra credit, derive the equation for power drawn by a load as a function of resistance. You'll see its maximum is when the load resistance equals the power supply's internal resistance.

Now go back to your original equations and see that they are just special cases of the internal resistance being 0 (voltage source) and infinite (current source).

\$\endgroup\$
8
\$\begingroup\$

You're forgetting the other equation: V=IR. If you reduce R then you increase I, meaning that the equations still hold and the universe is safe from spontaneously imploding.

\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

The values of Voltage, Current, and Resistance are intimately coupled in a circuit (by Ohm's Laws, V = I * R). Those three measures will always be in balance so that the equation holds. The power formulas involving resistance that the OP cited are trivially derived from Ohm's law. For a given resistance the power dissipation increases if (a) we increase the voltage, or (b) we increase the current. In either case, the other quantity -- voltage in the case of (b) or current in the case of (a) -- will change accordingly with Ohm's law.

Ohm's law does not generally allow for you to fix two of the quantities in the formula, and vary the third. You can only fix one of the quantities to determine the (linear) relationship between the other two at that operating point.

\$\endgroup\$
-2
\$\begingroup\$

Accurate comedic wisdom decrees that the three laws of thermodynamics are:

1. You can't win.

2. You can't break even, and

3. You can't get out of the game.

So, no matter how much power you put into a system, if there's work done between the input and the output, the output power can never equal the input power.

\$\endgroup\$
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ Does this have anything to do with the question? \$\endgroup\$ – hobbs Nov 26 '16 at 18:51
  • \$\begingroup\$ @hobbs: It does, indeed, since the question asked how to increase the power into the load, with a fixed input power into the circuit, and a greater output into the load from the circuit. \$\endgroup\$ – EM Fields Nov 26 '16 at 19:14
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ No, it didn't do two thirds of those. \$\endgroup\$ – hobbs Nov 26 '16 at 19:50
  • \$\begingroup\$ @hobbs: Why do you argue when you have no ledge to stand on? \$\endgroup\$ – EM Fields Nov 26 '16 at 20:24
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ I don't make a habit of standing on ledges, whether or not I'm arguing, and I find that comment to be as much of an absolute non-sequitur as this answer. What I'm trying to do is contribute to the quality of SE. \$\endgroup\$ – hobbs Nov 26 '16 at 20:51
-2
\$\begingroup\$

If you decrease "R", "I" will increase in the same formula of P=I2R , but as you can see, it is not just "I", it is "I" Squared, so power will increase.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.