1
\$\begingroup\$

This slide (page 19) analyzes the efficiency of nonideal boost converter. As you can see from the formula below, the efficiency of boost converter is dependent on duty cycle D and load resistance RL.

The smaller the duty cycle D and load resistance RL, the higher the efficiency.

I would like to understand intuitively how D and RL affect the efficiency. For duty cycle, the smaller duty cycle, the less time that current flows through inductor resistance. So the efficiency will increase.

Is this right?

However, how to explain the similar for load resistance, why smaller load resistance results in higher efficiency?

enter image description here enter image description here

\$\endgroup\$
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ R_L isn't the load resistance, its the series resistance of the inductor (inductor = L). As it grows smaller, the inductor wastes less energy through that resistor so that more can be transferred to the actual load, R. Curious that this "non-ideal" model neglects the voltage drop of the switch, as no real solid state switch has zero voltage drop. \$\endgroup\$ – Los Frijoles Dec 3 '16 at 6:46
  • \$\begingroup\$ @LosFrijoles The slide comes from a college class. This is the introduction to losses. Later lessons describe more conduction and switching losses. \$\endgroup\$ – Adam Haun Dec 3 '16 at 7:11
  • \$\begingroup\$ Ah makes sense. \$\endgroup\$ – Los Frijoles Dec 3 '16 at 7:12
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thank you, Los Frijoles. I made mistake in considering RL is load resistance. \$\endgroup\$ – anhnha Dec 3 '16 at 7:54
2
\$\begingroup\$

Current always flows through the inductor resistance. When the switch is in position 1, Vg only supplies power to RL and the inductor. When the switch is in position 2, Vg also supplies power to R. No energy is transferred from source to load in position 1, so position 1 is 0% efficient. Think about what happens with a 0% and a 100% duty cycle.

RL isn't the load resistance, it's the inductor resistance. Decreasing the inductor resistance obviously decreases the conduction losses.

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thanks for the explanation. My silly mistake relating to RL. \$\endgroup\$ – anhnha Dec 3 '16 at 7:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.