0
\$\begingroup\$

I've decided to replace my lead acid battery bank with LiFePO4.

I'm using the battery bank in a motorhome, where SoC can typically be at 30-50% for days, which is unacceptable for lead acid - just one of the many problems with lead acid.

I will build my own BMS. Coloumb counting, connecting/disconnecting MPPT/alternator charging, monitoring cell voltages, bottom balancing, and so on.

Once the battery is fully charged, I would like to draw all power from the solar charge controller, while the battery is in parallel, so that when the solar power is insufficient, the rest is drawn from the battery.

But I also don't want to apply a "float" voltage to the battery. I've considered mounting a diode which can be bypassed with MOSFETs when charging.

But is there a better way?

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

\$\endgroup\$
6
  • \$\begingroup\$ This is an ambitious project requiring a lot of development time and a fair amount of test equipment. Are you sure you want to do this? What is the load? D1 and Pch will likely require very good heat sinking. D1 should probably be a Schottky type. Also, Pch cannot prevent the battery from being charged because its body diode will be forward biased by MPPT CC. You might want to swap source and drain if the goal is to disable charging. \$\endgroup\$
    – user57037
    Jan 1, 2017 at 18:24
  • \$\begingroup\$ What does the mppt manual say about running it without a connection to a battery. \$\endgroup\$
    – RoyC
    Jan 1, 2017 at 23:07
  • \$\begingroup\$ It's likely that the LiFePO4 CAN safely be floared at higher than you show but somewhat below normal Vchgmax. LiFePO4 has a charging terminal voltage of about 3.6V so 4 cells = 14.4V = above the 13.5V MPPT output that you show. 13.5V/4 =~ 3.4V/cell which is at about the 3.2V you are liable to get at light load fully charged. You will need to look at what the manufacturer ays BUT 1. 13.5V is probably a safe float voltage once charged 2. 13.5V is NOT enough for a full charge. | Given the above, if you can change the MPPT voltage under program control you can probably do CCCV charging then ... \$\endgroup\$
    – Russell McMahon
    May 15, 2017 at 13:19
  • \$\begingroup\$ ... float at about 13.5V with or without load attached. | Actual LiFePO4 Vout without any PV depends on battery, SOC and load but is usually in the 3.0-3.3V range. You can go lower but usually remaining capacity is minimal (except at very highloads.) | While LiFePO4 SOC can notionally be safely tasen very low (0% according to some) I note that long lifetime warranties offered hear are dependent on SOC never below MUCH higher levels and NEVER below 20%. || Extra: You can charge LiFePO4 in CC only mode with Vmax trip of about 4.0-4.1V/cell. TO do this in some of their charge ICs. ... \$\endgroup\$
    – Russell McMahon
    May 15, 2017 at 13:23
  • \$\begingroup\$ ... If charged at CC then Vbat rises much as expected to about 3.6V per cell then rises far faster to Vmax. SOC goes for 9x% to 100% over this last voltage range. I have observed this action but do not have good data for relative SOC across this range but if you coulomb count AND keep Vmax below say 4.0 to 4.1V/cell then "you should be OK" (YMMV). (You'd probably ideally be monitoring per cell voltage if doing this - as you mention that you intended to do). \$\endgroup\$
    – Russell McMahon
    May 15, 2017 at 13:30

1 Answer 1

1
\$\begingroup\$

The following depends somewhat on specific attery characteristics and needs to be verified either with manufacturer's specifications or by testing.

It's likely that the LiFePO4 CAN safely be floated at higher than you show but somewhat below normal Vchgmax - so that Ichg is zero. LiFePO4 has a charging terminal voltage of about 3.6V so 4 cells = 14.4V = above the 13.5V MPPT output that you show. 13.5V/4 =~ 3.4V/cell which is at about the 3.2V you are liable to get at light load fully charged.

You will need to look at what the manufacturer says BUT
1. 13.5V is probably a safe float voltage once charged
2. 13.5V is NOT enough for a full charge.
Given the above, if you can change the MPPT voltage under program control you can probably do CCCV charging to desired endpoint, then float at about 13.5V with or without load attached.

Actual LiFePO4 Vout without any PV depends on battery, SOC and load but is usually in the 3.0-3.3V / cell range (3.3V only at very start).
You can go lower but usually remaining capacity is minimal (except at very high loads.)

While LiFePO4 SOC can notionally be safely taken very low (0% according to some) I note that long lifetime warranties offered here are dependent on SOC never below MUCH higher levels and NEVER below 20%.

Extra: You can charge LiFePO4 in CC only mode with Vmax trip of about 4.0-4.1V/cell. TI do this in some of their charge ICs.
If charged at CC then Vbat rises much as expected to about 3.6V per cell then rises far faster to Vmax. SOC goes for 9x% to 100% over this last voltage range. I have observed this action but do not have good data for relative SOC across this range but if you coulomb count AND keep Vmax below say 4.0 to 4.1V/cell then "you should be OK" (YMMV). (Coulombic efficiency of LiFePO4 (and LiIon) is > 99%).
You'd ideally be monitoring per cell voltage if doing this - as you mention that you intended to do.

You can probably top balance quite well due to the above LiFePO4 characteristic. Due to the low capacity in the 3.65V - 4.0V range you can easily hold cells which reach say 4.0V at that voltage by shunting charge current while the others 'catch up'.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.