3
\$\begingroup\$

My son got a quadcopter for his birthday, a "NiGHT LiONS TECH® X9 Flying Car 4 Channel 2.4Ghz RC Quadcopte Drone".

On the box, it says that it communicates at 2.4 GHz on the "100-200 band"; on the website it says:

2..4 Ghz spread spectrum transmitter uses multiple frequencies across 100-200 band

What is the 100-200 band? Does this refer to 2.4 GHz + an extra 100-200 Hz?

\$\endgroup\$
0
4
\$\begingroup\$

I smell a translation error. "Spread spectrum" is a term for technologies that take a narrowband signal (e.g. the very low-rate signal needed to communicate a few button/joystick levels) over a large bandwidth. You can do that in a number of ways – including FHSS (Frequency-hopping spread spectrum), that is, taking a single transmit symbol (e.g. the value "4") and quickly jumping to multiple frequencies ("hop frequencies", or "channels"), and sending e.g. the same symbol there.

Now, "channel" is a term very narrowly related to "band". I could imagine that for a non-native speaker, a "100-channel frequency hopping spread-spectrum system" becomes a "multiple frequencies across 100-200 band"; notice that in any case, the grammar is slightly off in that sentence.

As a technological comment: it certainly doesn't mean +100-200 Hz, because if you have an oscillator at 2.4 GHz, even generating a tone that is a couple hundred Hertz close to its specified frequency is very nontrivial. Consider the relative oscillator accuracy needed to hit exactly within 100 Hz of a wanted 2.4 GHz tone:

$$\frac{10^2}{2.4\cdot10^9}\approx 40\,\text{ppb .}$$

That is parts per billion. I did a quick search on Mouser for oscillators that have a better accuracy than 50 ppb – and the cheapest one starts at roughly 38€ (without taxes), so about the same price as your complete drone.
For this very reason, and because things can be moving relative to each other (Doppler!), frequency synchronization is a crucial part of every wireless communication device; the oscillators within a cheap 2G telephone certainly aren't great enough to "hit" the center of the 200 kHz GSM channels, but with a couple of tricks, the oscillators can be "trained" to run at much more exactly the same rate as the base station's oscillators, at least for a short duration of time. For 30-years-old GSM that was already a necessity – now imagine things like 3G (which, at least in Europe, uses a really offset-sensitive modulation) where symbol rates are much higher, and a smaller frequency offset has even greater effect, or 4G, which has 1200 subcarriers in a 20 MHz uplink, meaning that you need to know very exactly what frequency you are at – otherwise, you'd be receiving the wrong things.

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • \$\begingroup\$ Marcus, I actually bought a 2.4 GHz transceiver from SparkFun.com in hopes that I could program an Arduino to control something like the quad copter. You think that an off-the-shelf 2.4 GHz transceiver would be able to talk to something like this? \$\endgroup\$ – mj_ Jan 6 '17 at 3:51
  • \$\begingroup\$ Probably not. The band (2.4GHz) in which something operates doesn't imply the same transmission format - otherwise, your Bluetooth could talk to your WiFi, and your cordless phone, and your cordless mouse and your microwave oven. \$\endgroup\$ – Marcus Müller Jan 6 '17 at 8:59
  • \$\begingroup\$ @mj_ also see this answer electronics.stackexchange.com/a/273585 \$\endgroup\$ – Marcus Müller Jan 6 '17 at 9:15
1
\$\begingroup\$
  •  Since each bit is sent as multiple chips, you need more bps bandwidth to send the signal.
    • 11Mbps uses 8bits/Baud
    • In the 2.4 GHz or “S-band,” the Commission allocated the 2495-2500 MHz bandwidth or 505 bands of 1MHz
    • many parallel channels out of 100~200 band choices are used simultaneously for redundancy and lower Fading tracking loss from phase cancellation in flight.
    • Used frequency hopping, 96 channels of 1 MHz using 2GFSK
    • 802.11 Standard defined 26 orthogonal hop sequences - Can support multiple simultaneous transmissions – use different hop sequences E.g. up to 10 co-located APs with their clients
    • Number of chips per bit is called the spreading ratio
    • This is the spreading part of spread spectrum
  •  Given the Nyquist and Shannon results, you need more spectral bandwidth to do this. » Spreading the signal over the spectrum
  •  Advantage is that is transmission is more resilient. » DSSS signal will look like noise in a narrow band » Can lose some chips in a word and recover easily
  •  Multiple users can share bandwidth (easily).
    • Follows directly from Shannon (capacity is there)
\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.