0
\$\begingroup\$

Force Sensitive Resistor (FSR) is a sensor which lowers its resistance when there is force upon it. If there is no force acting on it, the resistance is ~10MOhms.

In the datasheet of FSR A401 of FlexiForce (here), it is mentioned that "measurement ranges of 0-1 lb and 0-7000 lb are achievable with the A401 sensor by utilizing the recommended circuitry. The force range can be extended by reducing the drive voltage, VT, or the resistance value of the feedback resistor, RF. Conversely, the sensitivity can be increased for measurement of lower forces by increasing VT or RF."

Here is the circuit:
FlexiForce recommended circuit for A401
And here is the plot of Volt/Force for 3 ranges:
plot FlexiForce A401

1- If the force range of sensor is dependent on the interface circuitry, then why standard range is defined to be 111N (0-25 lb) ?

2- What is the trade-off here? Is it the sensitivity? I mean if we are in 25 lb range, we can distinguish between 5 and 10 pounds by 1 and 2 volts. But if we are in 100 lb range, the same force range translates to only 0.2 volts. So if we have 10 bit ADC, the first case is 1024 levels but the second case is 204 levels. Am I right?

3- Is this sensor really capable of withstanding and discerning 2 to 2.6 tons of weight?

4- There is a limit on the current flow this sensor can tolerate. Suppose it is I_lim. What is the best way of getting sure that this current limit is not crossed over? I used a simple series 2k and 5V vcc so current is always below 2.5 mAmps. But this method changes the sensitivity (or doesn't?) Is there a better way?

Thank you very much :)

\$\endgroup\$
1
\$\begingroup\$
  1. Not sure
  2. Yes, since its conductivity (1/R) varies with applied force to distinguish smaller forces you need larger voltages.
  3. That seems to be what the datasheet is saying, subject to sensible mounting.
  4. Drive it from a current source fixed to (say) 1ma, but with plenty of "headroom". Then measure the voltage across it.

(The suggested circuit looks like a transimpedance amplifier?)

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ thanks for you response. Your solution (4) seems good to me, but why all applications which I've seen (DIYers, 3 papers, the datasheet) use the simple follower via opAmp circuit? \$\endgroup\$ – Zeta.Investigator Jan 21 '17 at 17:50
  • \$\begingroup\$ I suspect that trying to calibrate over the whole range doesn't work very well. If you calibrate it to 100N then apply 10kN then go back to 100N, do you go back to the same value. \$\endgroup\$ – pjc50 Jan 21 '17 at 18:15
  • \$\begingroup\$ The calibration issue you mentioned is correct. We are dealing with both creep and hysteresis in FSRs. But I'm just looking for a reliable interface circuit to start calibrating and using this sensor. Of all the resources I've looked, no one has used anything other than a simple follower (via opAmp). Why is this the case? \$\endgroup\$ – Zeta.Investigator Jan 22 '17 at 7:24
  • \$\begingroup\$ I've asked another question related to interface circuit here: electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/281759/… \$\endgroup\$ – Zeta.Investigator Jan 22 '17 at 7:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.