I'm building a small switching circuit consisting of 8 MOSFETs (bi-directional blocking, 4 in each direction), which should switch 100-200A at about 1kHz.

enter image description here

I've concluded that since PCB with a thick copper layer isn't readily available, a much better solution is simply mounting the MOSFETs directly on a bus bar, to which the power cables are also mounted. Thus, I only need to solder the Source-pin between the MOSFETs (in open air). This solves several problems: good thermal dissipation, low voltage drop from cable to MOSFET and easy mounting/replacement of all components with very little soldering.

My question is: how tight should I tighten the TO-220 package to the bus bar? Am I correct to assume that all the electronics are within the black plastic part, and that I can therefore tighten it as hard as I would like? Are there any potential problems, e.g. heat-warping causing poor connection etc?

Here's my schematic for the curious:


simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

Edit: Added link to MOSFET datasheet. Datasheet from manufacturer showing package details, but not showing D connected to tab.

  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ To clarify, you are looking for torque figures? \$\endgroup\$
    – W5VO
    Jan 24, 2017 at 14:40
  • 10
    \$\begingroup\$ Tighten it until the threads come off then back it off a quarter turn. Seriously though, you're not making a load-bearing connection, but an electrical and thermal one. You're building a circuit, not a suspension bridge, just do it up firmly by hand with a screwdriver / nut-spinner and you're good to go. \$\endgroup\$
    – user98663
    Jan 24, 2017 at 15:07
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Up to 200A through 4 mosfets is 50A each. If that is continuous, you'll probably melt the leads off your mosfet. \$\endgroup\$
    – marcelm
    Jan 24, 2017 at 15:22
  • 9
    \$\begingroup\$ Also, beware of using nyloc nuts in high temperature situations. You might be better served by locking washers. \$\endgroup\$
    – user98663
    Jan 24, 2017 at 15:45
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ @MarcusMüller, The datasheet says "Continuous Drain Current 120A" and "Pulsed Drain Current 800A" \$\endgroup\$ Jan 24, 2017 at 15:52

5 Answers 5


The part you are trying to get the heat out of is roughly in the centre of the black plastic part and mounted against the lead frame. Distorting the lead frame (the metal part) by overtightening will result in poor heat transfer and could even damage the bonding of the die to the lead frame or the die itself if it bends the soft metal leadframe, even slightly.

You should not overhang the part that contains the die as shown in the left part of your photo- ideally that's the part you want in intimate contact with the heat sink. The screw is offset because it's inconvenient to put a screw right through the centre of the die but you are really trying to create contact and some pressure between the part under the plastic and the heat sink. Some manufacturers use spring clips that push on the plastic itself. From an Infineon page, here is a part with a huge internal die. Keep in mind that the die is brittle silicon and the lead frame is soft and malleable.

enter image description here

Vishay Siliconix recommends 15 in-lb (1.7 N-m) torque for their TO-220 packages. There is limited advantage over 10 in-lb, as shown here:

enter image description here

It's fairly common to use torque screwdrivers and wrenches with power devices, and like anything else they may require regular calibration and testing. Inexpensive ones as used by gunsmiths etc. start at around $50 US.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Do you agree with the user above, that in my application of soldering the drain-leads together, the leads may accumulate heat which will not be dissipated into the heatsink/bus bar fast enough to prevent overheating? \$\endgroup\$ Jan 24, 2017 at 15:54
  • \$\begingroup\$ Good point about the overhang. I've checked and fortunately the overhang of the metal-part is only ~1mm - which I hope will be acceptable. I was hoping that the chip wouldn't get warmer than "warm to the touch", but perhaps I'm overly optimistic. If a 100A current is divided by 4 MOSFETs, it would only be 25A each, with 2.5mOhm (or less) on-resistance + switching heat (but 1kHz switching should be fairly low?) \$\endgroup\$ Jan 24, 2017 at 15:57
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ @user95482301 Your power calculations outlined above are extremely casual - something this powerful requires a much more carefully-done thermal analysis, especially when you're doing power-sharing among MOSfets. (Assuming an equal 25A share is too optimistic). \$\endgroup\$
    – glen_geek
    Jan 24, 2017 at 16:10
  • \$\begingroup\$ @glen_geek, So... 5 MOSFETs then? :) I'm just a hobbyist so learning how to do thermal analysis is probably more costly than overdimensioning? Wouldn't the MOSFETs self-balance to some degree (+/20% current imbalance compared to average)? E.g. I could assume one to have 30A while another is 10A? In the end, I'm hoping the copper will absorb the heat and that I could just add a fan if necessary (and maybe add a temp sensor on the busbar for monitoring) \$\endgroup\$ Jan 24, 2017 at 16:15
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @glen_geek I'm no expert in mosfets, but when doing some quick research to write this comment, I came across onsemi.com/pub_link/Collateral/AND8199-D.PDF . That article points out that MOSFETS have positive temperature coefficients so they have a general tendency to load balance. It certianly wont be a perfect balance, but at least that article suggests there wont be thermal runaway issues to deal with. \$\endgroup\$
    – Cort Ammon
    Jan 24, 2017 at 18:07

Am I correct to assume that all the electronics are within the black plastic part,


and that I can therefore tighten it as hard as I would like?

No, since that would deform the metal part that you're screwing onto the bus bar, and that will not play nice with the insides of the black plastic part :)

But assuming you're not planning to use raw force:

The job of pressing the case against the metal bar is to minimize the thickness of the thermal grease layer between case and the bar. At some point, that increase in pressure will not significantly reduce the thickness any more. I'd call that "hand-fast with a common screwdriver"; but I'm sure an official standard documents that.

EDIT with the alternative datasheet that actually shows the tab is connected to the drain, your circuit makes a whole lot more sense :)

So yes, in that case, no thermal grease. Instead, I'd frankly simply solder it to the bus bar by

  • applying solder paste and placing the transistors on the bus bar (not necessarily even securing them with a screw, unless the assembly could undergo substantial vibrations: in that case the screw is mandatory to lessen the risk of solder joints cracking),
  • heating the bus bar from below to the point that the solder paste melts and makes a good contact,
  • turn off the heating,
  • and then immediately start cooling it down, probably with a stream of fresh air, to make sure the "heat wave" coming from below will not reach a much higher temperature. Don't overdo it with the cooling down, though, since rapid thermal changes aren't good for the properties of the solder joint nor the integrity of your transistor.

Note it might be easier to do this with the 263 package.

  • \$\begingroup\$ I won't be applying thermal grease since I want maximum electrical conductivity. Would you say that my application is still suitable? \$\endgroup\$ Jan 24, 2017 at 15:05
  • \$\begingroup\$ As far as I read the datasheet of the MOSFET you're using in your schematic, I didn't find find any indication of the metal flange being connected to Gate, Source or Drain, so I assumed it was isolated! \$\endgroup\$ Jan 24, 2017 at 15:20
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @SpehroPefhany thanks! yeah, that second datasheet is a disaster. \$\endgroup\$ Jan 24, 2017 at 15:46
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ @user95482301 Well, if they do, not saying so in a datasheet that multiple engineers mistook for the right one is a disaster by itself. \$\endgroup\$ Jan 24, 2017 at 16:05
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ @MarcusMüller In your first bullet maybe you underestimate the importance of the screw (even if the OP solders the tab): if the assembly undergoes a substantial and constant level of vibrations, the solder joints may crack in the end. The OP gave no clue about the specific application, but it is not unreasonable to think of some heavy duty industrial environment (something attached to a heavy machine chassis?). \$\endgroup\$ Jan 24, 2017 at 16:16

I'd suggest that if you persevere with high current connections to TO-220 packages you are creating a nightmare field service/repair scenario for yourself. For any professional application it's much better to choose a module based device such as this. Modules are by far the best when considering anything that must be bolted to a busbar assembly and they are not overly expensive today.
Once you get in the 50-100 A range then cable sizes tend to become unwieldy and have to be firmly anchored. Simple solder joints are always at risk and can become brittle over time.

For anything hobby you should consider:

  1. The bolt holding down the package to the busbar for TO-220 is far too small. Even if you use the whole of the diameter of the TO-220 mounting hole size, you are unlikely to be able to achieve >10 in/lbs tab pressure with any real long term stability, even with a steel and spring washer. Pressure contacts such as this are not viable at high currents.

  2. Soldering a TO-220 package is always an option but soldering multiple devices to a busbar is an unworkable solution, It's unlikely you could ever repair it.
    Solder the package to a copper strip (I use 0.125 x 0.5 x 1.25 ETP copper tabs for this purpose). These can be easily soldered in an SMT drawer (add the tab, then when up to temperature add the device with flux on the back), tabs such as these allow multiple and much larger mounting bolt sizes with reasonable torque capability. When you screw the tabs to the busbar clean the joints but do not use heatsink grease as it's not electrically conductive. Always use a steel flat and spring washer under nut and flat washer under the screw head.

  3. TO-220 lead frame connections are not designed for free wire connections, especially at higher current. If you have to do this, then use a solder wire ferrule like this to ensure a stress free solder joint less likely to temperature age. You also need to support the wire, since the leadframe will break if you have even a medium vibration environment. The leadframe should not be exposed to any side or flex forces. It's a good idea to support connections like this with a two piece barrier as a stress relief.

  • \$\begingroup\$ My concern was that the SOT-227 modules seem to have a high Rdson, and seem expensive when compared on raw datasheet values (e.g. $18 for 155A/12.9mOhm doesn't sound very attractive compared to $1 for 120A/2.5mOhm...). But obviously a module is much more manageable. Everything is more manageable if you're willing to throw money at a specialized product. \$\endgroup\$ Jan 25, 2017 at 12:59
  • \$\begingroup\$ Do you think this approach would be better? I assume it would solve several problems: e.g. current carrying/thermal capacity of the legs, no problems with vibration/solder joints... but there would be no gate resistance would could be a problem (and soldering a resistor to the gate would reintroduce the problem of vibration to the joint): turtlesarehere.com/assets/images/Gate-Source.jpg \$\endgroup\$ Jan 25, 2017 at 13:01
  • \$\begingroup\$ @user95482301 Series Gate resistance is not essential in a design, and all designs have an inherent I(Gate) charge current limitation. The problem with soldering leads to the Gate and Source is that the package is not designed for this type of implementation. Your example of costs is much more complicated than just the price. Assume at 120 A you need at least 1-4 AWG wire to carry this current (and dissipate heat from the connection). How would you provide a solder joint? What other form of termination or support would/could you build? Almost anything you do here is mechanically at high risk. \$\endgroup\$ Jan 25, 2017 at 16:43
  • \$\begingroup\$ @user95482301. I've used this approach (copper tabs) in several hobby situations over the years and it's always been easy to repair (when the smoke gets out). I've also worked on professional 3 phase power supplies (Supermini Era) with current in the 100's of Amps and short circuit detection in the 1000 A range. It's not just the Smoke that gets out here, but the Blue light escapes too ...and that tends to leave wreckage. \$\endgroup\$ Jan 25, 2017 at 16:55

From the graph, it looks like 10 in-lb is the torque you should use.

Because of possible heating and mechanical problems, I recommend using a metal lock washer between the head of the screw and the TO-220 tab. In addition, you should minimize the overhang, but not so short that the leads are in a position prone to short to the bus bar.
I am a firm believer that there is no better teacher than experience, so go ahead and build the circuit, it will "show you" any shortcomings your design might have. Keep in mind that this is OK for a prototype, not for a finished commercial product.


How tight is 7nm. Use a nut and bolt w/ external star lock washer and a dab of permanent thread locker loctite will hold a to220 package securely.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.