2
\$\begingroup\$

While learning the Lumped Circuit Abstraction (and the Lumped elements discipline), an inductor was considered a lumped element. But I fail to see how it fits the requirements of LCA:

  1. For it, the \$\frac{d\phi}{dt}\$ is not zero.
  2. In a circuit with an inductor, (in AC supply), resistances would not be the only irreversible energy loss, owing to the inductor's em waves.

Although there are various ways to put in the restrictions after which LCA is rendered valid, but these two requirements are commonly cited.

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ All lumped elements are unrealistic perfect models. \$\endgroup\$
    – PlasmaHH
    Commented Jan 27, 2017 at 10:56
  • \$\begingroup\$ But even for a perfect inductor, would not the rate of change of flux be non-zero? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 27, 2017 at 11:03
  • \$\begingroup\$ @PlasmaHH: that's not answering the questions. Although it is a model it is satisfied to a very very large extent in very very many practical cases; namely in all cases where it makes sense to work with a circuit diagram (with extensive quantities contained in ODEs) instead of Maxwells Equations (with intensive quantities contained in PDEs). The latter one is much more difficult. \$\endgroup\$
    – Curd
    Commented Jan 27, 2017 at 11:57

1 Answer 1

3
\$\begingroup\$

It is important to realize that lumped circuit element conditions must hold only outside of the circuit elements. Otherwise you would not be able to have any dynamics (current or volatge changes) at all.

I.e. the requirement for good lumped circuit element approximation is that \$\frac{d\Phi}{dt} =0\$
outside of the lumped element.

That's the case for a good inductor (e.g. a toroidal core inductor; the complete magnetic field change is kept inside).

The same is the case for \$\frac{dq}{dt}\$:
It has to be 0 outside of the circuit elements. Of course it is not true if you look at only one plate of a capacitor. It is true though for the outside of the whole capacitor.

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ What about the power dissipation? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 27, 2017 at 11:54
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Do you mean power dissipation because of resistance in an inductor? You can model this simply by an equivalent series resistor (ESR) which would still statisfy lumped circuit approximation. Power loss by E/M field radiation would, however, violate the lumped circuit approximation. \$\endgroup\$
    – Curd
    Commented Jan 27, 2017 at 12:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.