I am working on a project in which I need to find a PWM duty cycle to dim an LED to the same brightness level as an LED being dimmed with CCR. Initially, I was considering using a camera for this: I would take a picture of each LED, and compare the intensity with photo-editing software. I am not sure how accurate this would be, though. I was wondering if there were any devices out there (light sensors, etc.) that could help me achieve this.
These are I2C devices with very high resolution and integration times that are adjustable to reject 50/60 Hz and above modulation effects, so they should reject your PWM frequency very well.
You could calibrate 2 individual sensors or use just a single one in a strict comparison mode.
There are multiple solid state light sensors available, but this is the only one I've seen with such good calibration control.
Depending on how professional a solution you are developing there are Arduino libraries for this device from Sparkfun, though they lack much in the way of calibration capability.
Get a tiny 5V LDO and optically filtered detector that matches eye response in a 5mm case < $5. Choose R for sensitivity and test in darkness as ambient light will cause errors unless you make a flat black tube to aim at source.
I found these very accurate and repeatable for LED brightness to << 1% using DVM.
I was wondering if there were any devices out there (light sensors, etc.) that could help me achieve this.
there are definitive light sensors that can do that. But they all suffer from wide tolerance.
Two (major) categories of approaches to try:
1) single sensor: no tolerance to worry about. But you have to have a way, often mechanical, to expose the sensor to the two light sources, separately. Can be challening, expensive and not terribly reliable.
2) two sensors: one for each light source. Most certainly requires calibration. Can be tough to deal with there.
I have done #2 myself and in my case, it was building a light box and place the two sensors in the light box. Alter the light intensity and record the output from the two sensors so you know that when the light intensity is the same even when the two sensors give differing output.
Tedious to calibrate, tough to program, and no good for mass production. But it can work very well with sensors even if they have wildly differing characteristics.