Just how is it that a high VSWR can damage the final transistors in an RF power amplifier?

Is the transmission line significant beyond the effect it has on transforming the impedance of the load at the other end? Or would an equivalent lumped impedance directly at the amplifier's output be just as damaging?

Of all the possible impedances that result in a given VSWR, are they all equally bad?

Is the reflected power "absorbed" by the amplifier? For example, if I'm getting 100W reflected power, is that more or less the same as putting a 100W heater on the amplifier?

I've also read that excessive voltage can be the mechanism leading to damage. How is it that a voltage higher than the supply voltage can appear? Is there a limit to how high this voltage can be in the presence of an arbitrary mismatch?


Just how is it that a high VSWR can damage the final transistors in an RF power amplifier? Is it simply the wrong impedance (after transformation by the feedline) appearing at the terminals or is the transmission line in particular important?

It depends on the design of the amplifier you're using.

If the reflection coefficient seen by the amplifier is -1 (thus \$\rm{VSWR}\approx\infty\$), that's equivalent to driving a short circuit, and you can see why that would be an overload condition for just about any type of amplifier.

If the reflection coefficient is +1 (again \$\rm{VSWR}\approx\infty\$), that's equivalent to driving an open circuit. If you're amplifier's output stage looks like a common emitter amplifier with resistive pull-up (for example a CML buffer), that's not going to be a problem at all. In some other amplifier configuration with reactive elements, the increased output voltage could cause breakdown of the output devices, for example.

Is it reflected power being absorbed and dissipated in the transistors or something else?

If the output of your amplifier has a real part to its output impedance, then that would imply that it is absorbing the reflected wave.

However the reflected wave will likely be coherent with the outgoing wave the amplifier is producing. Thus it's possible that interference effects between the two waves enhance or reduce the possibility of damage to the amplifier, depending on the phase relationship between them.

If you're driving a long line, then small changes in the signal frequency, or even the temperature of the line, could change the reflected wave phase significantly, so it would probably not be a good idea to try to design on the assumption that you can control the phase of the reflection.

If you're driving a short line, then controlling the phase of a reflection by controlling the line length is a common practice, done every time we use a stub or shunt as a matching filter, for example.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Can you please elaborate on how the output voltage can be increased? I'm having a hard time getting my head around how it can exceed the supply voltage. \$\endgroup\$ – Phil Frost Feb 13 '17 at 20:20
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Phil, imagine an inductor pulling up the collector instead of a resistor. Somebody asked a question about this in the last few days. \$\endgroup\$ – The Photon Feb 13 '17 at 20:23
  • \$\begingroup\$ That makes perfect sense thinking of it that way, thanks \$\endgroup\$ – Phil Frost Feb 14 '17 at 0:01

It's a reflection problem. If the antenna in particular is not matched with the feed line power is reflected back down the feed line. This leads to a standing wave on the feed line of nodes of high voltage where the incoming wave reinforces the reflected wave.

A VSWR meter reads the proportion of the transmitted wave that is reflected back giving you some idea of the size of the problem.

The higher the VSWR the higher the voltage at high voltage nodes and it is this that does the damage to the driver electronics. Most Higher power radios these days detect the VSWR and shut down or reduce power to avoid damage.


There are really only a few things that kill RF power devices:

  • Over Current (You can burn out the bond wires)
  • Over Voltage (A typical device running at 100V (~50V rail) will fail if Vds exceeds ~130V even momentarily).
  • Over Drive (Especially MOSFET and LDMOS style parts, but also tetrodes), gate puncture or overheating the control grid.
  • Over heating, should be obvious, but high power devices often run the junction within a few tens of degrees of failure at full power.

Voltages and currents can clearly be increased by a reflection having the appropriate sign, as can power (Safe operating area) if the reflection produces high voltage across the device at the same time there is a lot of current flowing.

Over drive can have you via the reverse transfer capacitance or the feedback network if device stability is compromised by the fault.

Most rf amps lack the headroom to cope with a highly reactive load, because that costs money.


Usually, a radio-frequency power amplifier is followed by some kind of impedance-matching network (likely including inductors and capacitors) to transform the load resistance to something that the power transistor can cope with, considering its voltage and current handling abilities. A transmission line may also be associated with this network. But after all, at the operating frequency, the power transistor sees a desirable load resistance.
An amplifier designer also ensures that at all other frequencies the matching network presents an impedance to the power transistor that ensures no spurious oscillations.
Power MOSfet amplifier with three loads (1, 50, 1000 ohm An example 7 MHz amplifier. A MOSfet drives a 50 ohm load through a matching network consisting of a low pass filter of L's, and C's. It can deal with peak current of 3 A, and peak voltage of 90 V. With a 50 ohm load (blue), it operates within these limits. But a 1 ohm load (green) causes peak current to be excessive and peak voltage to exceed MOSfet breakdown. A 1000 ohm load (red) is acceptable in this case.

Note that this SPICE run neither creates smoke, nor shows what happens when drain voltage or current exceeds limits. No transmission line is included here. For a different matching network, or a transmission line whose length could vary, these results could drastically change, possibly exceeding limits for the 1000 ohm load. A conservative designer might employ a MOSfet having larger limits, yielding a stable amplifier that remains within limits for any load impedance.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.